Why is the assumption all jobs should provide a living wage?
Maybe it seems very crafty to those seeking an excuse to hate them, but this is what politics and policy advocacy looks like.
This might not be a big deal, but your take is objectively wrong.
Certainly these funds would in no way be raised from the Wall Street bankers that Clinton definitely does not represent, no she is extremely anti-bank how dare you suggest that
Here is a remarkable bit from the recently WikiLeaked emails of John Podesta, chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. If it doesn’t quite reveal some nefarious master plan for technoligarch world domination, it at least provides an opportunity to goggle at some extremely dumb campaign stooges.
For those who are going to bitch about the endowment and “how it works”, the endowment is there to provide income for ongoing operations of the University, and a large chunk of that is for ‘general support’. On the other hand, there’s unrestricted net income. Per Harvard’s annual financial reports, Unrestricted Net…
I wish I had to worry about a Big Endowment.
Yeah, I had to look it up. I’m super old.
I don’t think you know what a beer belly is.
Because it’s not tax evasion. It’s actually something that anyone who claims a substantial loss has to do because the IRS limits the amount of a loss someone can take on their tax return to a certain percentage/dollar amount.
I think her IQ is on fleek.
If she’s the future we’re so fucking doomed. That is actually worse than I was expecting.
If I may quote one of the most provocative journalists of our time:
something very special has died lol -leah
I vote for the latter, from this story about a DHS employee using work computers to look at porn, only to blame the department for not having better Internet filters to prevent him from doing so:
Lame stream media!
This is the end of an era.
I think she left before getting a degree.
He’s in a better place.
this is me every time I think about Leah.