Daaayyuumm. Day 1 and they are going to exceed their initial goal. This could end up a pretty amazing game.

Is it superfluous in the way that , say, the PhysX effects in the Arkham games (papers being kicked up during combat, dust flying around, etc) are?

Damn, that hair-tech must be something else.

Read the headline; immediately threw in some microwave popcorn, and skipped the whole article; it was pretty obvious that down here is where the real show begins.

God damnit, Sony! Get your act together so our pal Lewis doesn't have to exempt any of Aretha Franklin's discography!

You just answered your own questions, intentionally. Based on that I don't believe your stance is open to debate, just trying to incite the masses.

Just play Wukong top lane. You'll be fine.

But wait... What happens to the reject nuggets?? Are they melted down and used to make new ones? If so isn't the meat and breading supposed to be separate prior to cooking the nuggets?

Difference between this and the blizzard fiasco is blizzard was straight up adding real names to your base bnet account. That was intrusive.

Based on his vague assertions, I think Cerny makes it clear that:

Yeah, or they go the subsidized purchase route; which is definitely a good idea for both companies to offer that option.

Waayy too much GDDR5 in that thing to price it that low. 399 is much more realistic (And still probably at next to no profit on the hardware).

I fail to see how this article is relevant at all considering that PS3 games are sold for $60 new today, in 2013. Sure, PS4 games will be cheaper than PS3 games were then, but not cheaper than they they are now, which is what we're accustomed to/accustomed to complaining about.

i5 3570k, oc'd to a stable 4.4; 16GB 1600mhz Corsair dominator; 120gb FORCE3 SSD; 3 TB standard drive; Asus GTX 670 directcuii TOP edition; all sitting pretty in an Asus maximus V Formula mobo. I'm good to go I think.

Reading this argument has me wondering why you play games.... Apparently to get extremely semantic about them on message boards it would seem.

Due to the extremely large number of Android apps, having a section that only displays the past 30 days of releases in descending order of downloads is far too broad. Not to mention that with that model, any new release that, say, was JUST RELEASED, and therefore has no downloads yet, would not even appear in the…

Well, your both wrong, ironically.

No you cannot. All you can do is see the apps released within the past 30 days in order of descending popularity. That isn't even close to sorting by release, especially when you consider the number of apps on the market.

The Top New Paid and top new free show you apps released within the past 30 days, in descending order based on popularity. That is not very helpful, nor is it sorting by release.

Well; it was done with Mother 3, so I can see this going pretty well.