Gibbelins
Gibbelins
Gibbelins

Yeah, it wasn't bad to talk about skin care; I just wish she had framed it differently, without assuming ignorance.

Yup, I heard about that. Very funny.

Nah. They probably also think "Born in the USA" is an uplifting patriotic tune.

I don't think it's a valid assumption that someone who knows nothing about make-up knows nothing about skincare. I take very good care of my skin, and part of that is that I refuse to constantly block my pores with make-up.

You should come to first dates with a measuring tape, and then you can eliminate at least half of them right then and there ;)

Yeah, that seems like a rather foolish endeavor as well as an unethical one. Some topics are more important to be upfront about than others - though of course I'm sure it's in the eye of the beholder what is absolutely essential to disclose.

I've had a lot of conversations with my guy friends about whether it's ever ok to be misleading in your dating profile as long as you are honest fairly early in the relationships. The impression I get from these guys is that they feel like the deck is so stacked against guys in the online dating market that they

I used to think that way, that as a society we overmedicate experiences that are supposed to be a normal part of life. But I've come to realize that there a lot of things that are "normal" in the sense of happening to a lot of people, and yet they make those people miserable. Why shouldn't we address those problems if

It's a regular tourist stop for Antarctic cruises.

In fact, I think ALL of the featured stories in the article were about both parents conspiring together. The article just switched to talk exclusively about mothers 3/4 in for no clear reason. Perhaps the author thought she just needed to slant it to relate it closer to Jezebel interests? Like, this is supposed to

You believe women are all just imagining their sexual problems? If someone sees their lack of libido as a problem, then it is a problem. If they don't see it as a problem, no one is going to force them to take a drug for it.

That can't be the reason though - the three girls all showed up together, and they were told that two of them could enter as a (same-sex) couple, but the third needed an additional person to enter.

Sadly, it probably won't be compatible with antidepressants. It works in part by decreasing levels of serotonin, while antidepressants usually work by increasing serotonin.

Unfortunately, it probably won't work with most antidepressants, since one of its main components is to decrease levels of serotonin - exactly the thing that antidepressants are meant to increase.

Agreed. As much as I wish there was an effective drug like this on the market, from what I've read, there actually are a lot of legitimate concerns with this drug. For one thing, it's level of effectiveness is really not that impressive when you look at the actual data. Also, it works by altering brain chemistry in

Are you talking about the list in the post? Because those are the side effects of Viagra, not this new drug for women.

I think it would be interesting to hear how people included children from previous relationships into the wedding planning and ceremony.

What are you talking about? The OP has no legal connection to the child.

Yeah. Any time a celebrity makes comments like this, I think perhaps feminists ought to reflect on what about the movement makes so many successful women eager to distance themselves from it. Instead, sites like this just wag their fingers at such women and continue to wonder why they don't like them.

For the people who say, "Not until after marriage," I wonder how long they think you should wait to get married. I have a suspicion it is very similar to the graph of when the less-marriage-inclined people think you should move in together.