the fuck

@meseta: Yes! I did a doubletake their for a second xD

This looks great! Gotta love its simplicity.

@James Eagle: LOL "Extra for virus software" Honestly though, the point of Godaddy is not an email service, if you want a dedicated email service, use something like Gmail or Hotmail.

VOTE: Godaddy

I would not have confidence in structural stability of such a desk beyond use as a bookshelf. Even if it was proffessionally installed, I constantly be nervous about it collapsing and "There goes my $300 monitor" :(

Funny how SSDLife is already branching into a Pro version that you have to pay for before its even produced a final version, its still in the Release Candidate stage, and it was even charging in the beta stage xD.

I would swear that I've seen several posts on lifehacker with almost the exactly same title: "Flash is killing your battery".

What is this I don't even.

This debate is kind of like how grandparents are always like "What happened to board games/sports?". They've been replaced (Ok, sports haven't exactly been replaced, but from the perspective of elderly people who remember sports being the main and only form of entertainment in their childhood, the influx of video…

@CDodd: Yeah, I understand they're just trying to prevent remote detonation, but removing wifi when an easy workaround for terrorists is available seems a like a little extreme, especially for long flights. I wouldn't mind not having wifi on say a flight thats only 2 or 3 hours, but its really nice on those mind…

@Kamatari +: No prob, it was a little TL;DR ;)

@zakany001: Sweet! I'll have to remember that when I get an Android :D Thanks

@Kamatari +: I don't think you really understand what people are talking about when we mention an ad-hoc network. The concern is that a bomb could be activated via a wifi connection. Even if they stopped offering in-flight wifi, a device could still be activated by an ad-hoc wireless connection the terrorist could…

Banning wifi makes me laugh, since the only way to enforce it would be to literally ban any device that appears to be a phone/mobile computer, in case that device could create an ad-hoc network.

@sugardeath: I wasn't critising the article or saying it had no worth to anyone, I was just sharing my opinion on the merit of its use in my life.

@flinx1: Before criticizing me on just one point I made, I suggest reading my entire post. I made many other points that "made sense".

@RabidTurtl: I should mention that I was talking about whole disk encryption, not encrypted file containers. There is really no reason not to store sensitive documents in encrypted file containers, since there is no overall system performance loss.

@RabidTurtl: I agree, the average person really has no need to encrypt their drive, since very few thief's break into ones house to steal tax information/bills. The only threats are malicous hackers, which one can protect against using a good firewall, AV tool, and Anti-Spyware application, alongside good user…

@SpudDude: The average thief will more likely just be interested in selling the laptop he stole than snooping around its contents, he can just erase the drive and be done with it.