Oded Yinon and the Greater Israel plan unfortunately subjects every nation in the Middle East to Israel’s “skin in the game”.

Pretty sure Israel had been enjoying unfettered access to Syrian airspace to bomb the Syrian Arab Army at their leisure until the Russians showed up with S-300’s, Su-30’s, Pantsirs, and EW equipment.

Less malleable than your mind.

And yet the fascists are still trying to insist it was pro-Russian separatists who brought the plane down. Hint: it wasn’t.

I didn’t submit it as evidence of anything other than the fact that the investigation was not conducted in good faith. The fact that hundreds and hundreds of eye witnesses to the incident were summarily excluded from testifying at the hearing or being included in the final report should indicate beyond a shadow of a…

Here’s another screenshot from the CIA’s sad, sad attempt to explain away this crime. Do you think the remaining portion of this plane would ever have taken a nose-down attitude following the explosion?

Why were FBI agents breaking into the evidence hangar and switching labels on parts and bending sheet metal to give the indication that the explosive force came from within as opposed to without?

Who knows? I don’t keep a list of these incidents, but as I’ve mentioned previously TWA 800 was the moment I lost faith in both the corporate media and the government to tell the truth about incidents of consequence.

Have you watched the silly cartoon the CIA put together to explain the crash? They claimed that everyone who reported having seen missiles had actually seen a trail of burning fuel being left behind as the plane climbed more than 1,000 feet in a surprisingly normal manner, i.e. like a normal plane. Here’s a screen…

What I meant was that we’re being misled as to who was ultimately responsible for MH17. I don’t believe it was the pro-Russian rebels for a second, because they were reacting to the coup d’etat fomented by the usual suspects (Neocons, Victoria Nuland, etc.).

It’s evidence that the witnesses were actively ignored because what they saw didn’t fit in with the predetermined explanation for the incident.

You will not convince me and it’s obvious that I’m not convincing anyone here, so I’m done wasting my time. I envy those of you gullible enough to believe whatever you’re spoon fed, no matter how preposterous it is.

I know enough to realize when I’m being lied to, which is more than you can say.

Yeah, sure; a 747 with everything forward of the wings missing is going to climb like an eagle. Keep on telling yourself that.

I’m in no way claiming that every plane crash is the result of nefarious action, but in certain instances that’s the conclusion I draw.

I think many people here would be surprised at just how much can be kept secret, or at least explained away with weak cover stories.

The engines were probably running until they hit the water or had their fuel lines severed, but they wouldn’t provide lift to a plane with 80% of its mass located behind the center of gravity.

It was struck by a missile or missiles.

I wish I were high, but I’m out of weed.