Fantastic line!

I couldn’t disagree more. While #2 wasn’t the best (still a good movie), #3 was a god damn masterpiece right up there with the original.

Damn, you beat me to it!!

Next up: A kitchen sink manufacturer.

I think the argument there is that since the light is timed for the speed limit of the road, the yellow is too quick for actual turning speeds. Since you have to slow down for a turn, you will be traveling slower going into the intersection, and there is a sweet spot where you still can’t safely stop for the light,…

Why are Bolts garbage? I know the Volt is a pretty nice car.

Yes, that is almost certainly what they’re buying that spectrum for, however this rollout that they’re referencing in the article is going to live on existing LTE bands, such as 850 and 1900mhz.

Pretty early for COTD

Not that I believe you would buy this car anyway, but that would be a pretty stupid reason to not buy a car you wanted.

The technology used is what determines the generation of wireless we’re on, not the speeds given. The issue here is still the marketing hype around LTE in the first place. When it was first rolling out, there weren’t many people on it, and the speeds were actually what the carriers were advertising. The issue there is…

No, it still is not what the industry would consider a new generation, but sure, you can think what ever you like.

It really is not the next generation. 5G is already an established standard and is based on very different technology than 4G, and will live on different bands of the spectrum.

...Which still is not 5G.

Haven’t been able to watch the video yet (at work), but is this the same guy as manyatruenerd? Because I loved his videos

Just wanted to say that your well reasoned and level headed responses here are appreciated, even if most here seem to disagree with you.

Read the article again. The issue is that the “5G” they’re rolling out is not actually 5G technology, but rather a slightly faster LTE, which is still firmly a 4G technology.

Exactly.

Torque was 200 for the Z, but for a good contemporary comparison, the 2005 Accord V6 made 255hp, and 232lbs-ft of torque out of a 3.0 V6, so not too terribly far off the 4.2.

That is ridiculously low. Especially when considering something like the V6 in the 300ZX that was released a decade before made ~20hp more in turbo form.