@FurtiveParsnip: Even if it was available Stateside, soccer moms and NASCAR dads would make sure it was a sales flop by continuing to buy Tahoe's and Explorers.

@SlowMo: That would be greatly appreciated. I predict that it will cost ten fold the Tempo's Kelley Blue Book value to bring it over there just for a quick (or more likely, not-so-quick) spin around the 'Ring and a speedometer topping run on the Autobahn. Even though the speedo tops at 83MPH...

@Vintage Racer is out taking pictures:

OnStar saddens me. It reminds me that with every generation, children are growing weaker and parents lives are being made easier. Whats next, a button that sends in an emergency squad to change your child's diaper?

@FromaBuick6: I want to ship my Ford Tempo to Germany just to top the speedometer legally on the Autobahn AND drive the Nurburgring, just to get a time. It will be hilarious and awesome at the same time.

@Tomsk is leading the search for the preview button: They weren't fake on the '69 though, at least so I've heard..

@SinisterSaracen: I am aware of all these facts. Just strange. Think about it, a Cadillac handles better and is faster then a Camaro. Cadillac. The brand that gave us the wonderful early 90s Brougham that my cousin drives around, possibly the only car slower then a '89 Ford Tempo.

@Murilee Martin: But how much is interchangeable between the MGB GT and the Midget? Besides, without even looking at the location of the MGB I already know its probably over 3,000 miles away. ;)

@rlj676-Carbon Footprint Size - Clownshoe: Yeah I'm not saying I think the Chevy looks are any worse or better then Fords, Dodges, et cetera. All trucks have grown larger and flashier, and I honestly can't say one is more guilty then the next. I've just always liked the General's truck designs until the GMT900. I…

The CTS-V is still faster? Woah.

@rlj676-Carbon Footprint Size - Clownshoe: To each his own, and looks are entirely opinion. I personally have a 1994 Chevy Cheyenne K2500, and my ma has a 2002 Chevy Silverado 1500. I've seen the GMT900's around I just don't like them in appearance. Not that this is a fault of Chevy alone, I think a lot of new trucks…

@Å sjrøllyng pléyя: Woah! So what is your car?

@Greater than a Ford Tempo: To exterminate Manbearpig once and for all.

Who cares about muscle car fuel economy? Who BUYS a Camaro or Mustang with fuel economy in mind?

Very impressive, but isn't that slower then the top-o'-the-line Mustang? Actually 4.7 seems average these days. Still, when the car I'm driving "flies" from 0-60 in 10.9 seconds..

I hope they do some revisions to that front fascia area. I've always loved Chevy truck designs, but the current one is just not.. Chevy. I miss that big chrome split grill with the dual stacked headlamps of the GMT400 era.

I'm already planning on making the mistake of buying a British Leyland product, and I just can't buy two..

I'm liking the '65. My mom's first car was a circa 1965 Impala, and it was only a few years ago that it was finally crushed. Not that it ran, as it sat a ways in the woods for a couple decades.

I voted for the Tempo. I have my reasons.

@Å sjrøllyng pléyя: ....