oh lord...+1

I assume his ability to block is point 1 on his list of evidence

there is only one flavor of accepted political opinion in Madison...please get it right.

it is a game, so they count as much as the rules make them count...and for most watchers it is way more exciting to watch regular offense then it is to watch kickers.

K balls

you must hate football if that is a serious question.

the problem is the host isn't needed - and just is often awkward. Have the person give the opening monologue and be done with it...just have someone announce the next presenter.

Better said than me.

seems like the big advantage would be shooting a much wider image then what you can reflect through the back windshield.

No - but accuracy matters and there are ways to write about this and still be sensitive to the horrific crime. I certainly never called BS nor intended to troll this thread.

whew! I thought you were going to try and come off as reasonable...glad we got that cleared up.

You are missing the point - which is the crux of this study. You said:

this study challenges the notion that breastmilk has any benefits...unless you were talking about benefits like cost and availability.

But you do need statistics and science to say one is actually better. This is a single study, not saying it alone defines unchallengable proof. But, you can't claim one is absolutely better and then tell people to STFU...that makes you a hypocrite.

"But I decided long ago that if I CAN make the healthiest choice for my son with no medical issues preventing me from doing otherwise then I will, because for every mom out there who doesn't nurse, in spite of the ample evidence that it's healthier/more natural than formula"

I really have no desire to come off as trying to wash away this awful murder. There was a more recent exhaustive investigative piece done on this episode that certainly seems more reliable than a single quote from a complete scumbag sitting in prison.

I hesitated to even write the initial post because I do recognize the positive changes that have come in protections because of his death...but basically:

uh - no - he was murdered because of drugs...like I said good things have come out of his heinous death. There are appropriate ways to write about it that don't require one to perpetuate a myth.

"That was just me relenting"

"who was tortured and murdered for being gay in 1998"