Not more than traditional thermoelectric power plants

Wasn't this what root did to be abel to hear the machine in the TV series "Person of interest"?

Call me old fashioned, but I hate infographics (ok, too strong. Dislike), one can't copy and paste nothing in a useful form. "Columns" in youtube form are worse.

I oppose abortions for the same logical / non-emotional reason I oppose death penalty: it is irreversible. There is no going back after the fact if, for example, whatever reasons for the abortion dissapear, or if the condemned is proven innocent.
There are also alternatives for abortion (and death penalty), such as…

In my case it causes the menu selection to jump rapidly between the "S" in "Search Google with this image" and "Send image to Dolphin" (from Dolphin extension for Chrome). But nice shortcut, other letters works in other context menus.

Because 15 minutes earlier you may be easier to wake up (based on your movements) than 15 minutes later, extra sleep and all.

Your expression says it all ("Dear God, how did I convinced myself to drink this???") he hehe...

That was the first thing that I saw too.

Those are the standard "What, Who, When". But nice of LH to remind us, as these questions are often dismissed because the answers are considered obvious (and different for each participant)

Thank you for your insights, Ben. It is indeed a dilemma, being accepted for what one is not, or run the risk or being rejected for what one is. One should just BE, regardless of acceptance of irrelevant people.

Well, if a prospective partner asks, THEN the issue becomes relevant, not before! Let me give an example. I work as an engineer in a company, and despite being a bachelor, there is absolutely no need for me to discuss at the office if I'm gay or straight, nor to my coworkers to know details of my personal life. If in…

Hmmm.. you have a point (of which I'm not convinced, but don't reject it either).

Exactly. Gay people are... just people. They should be thought of like blond people, or coffe-loving people or tall people. The only obligation sholud be to themselves (and maybe loved ones), there should be no obligation to come out to society. There are special cases like Adam's, that can help people with his coming…

Yes, you have a choice between answering, not answering, lie, or come out. You should not feel pressure neither to lie nor to come out, and if you do, the rest should not define you as "that gay guy" any more than "that left-handed guy".

Feels like a celebrity stopped to talk to us, didn't it Tyler? Which it kind of is.

And you can answer "Yes, I do", show them a picture if you like, or "No I don't", but that's that. It should not be admissible for mere acquaintances to follow a negative answer with an "Are you gay then?" any more than they could follow your affirmative with an "Are you straight then?"

I tend to agree with you, there should be no need to come out of the closet, less so as a special announcement... or to hide in a closet, for starters.

That was my intention from the begining, to say that coming out should not be more of a spectacle than "confessing" than one is left handed (I often use that comparison)... there should be no need neither to hide in a closet nor to come out of it.

Rarely. I read LH mostly at work (don't tell my boss!), and since I share my office it would be impolite to impose my coworkers with whatever I may be hearing (and if I wear headphones my boss might think I'm watching a movie).

Ha ha ha... thank you for your comment on my grammar. English is not my native language, so I am always afraid of making a mistake and keep consulting my grammar with experts (Google, mainly)