And, he's going to rejoin the OU coaching staff...so the joke has come full circle to being one of the all time latest.

Not to mention the problems with getting FAA/EASA/CAAC/Thai DAC/fucking everyone authority to even go supersonic.

Neither of those are benzo's, but have the +1 anyway because humor.

Really, really insightful.

I'm not sure if you're alluding to your previous post, or implying that I misunderstood what you were trying to convey in some way.

You're perceived to be part of the patriarchy, so your opinion is invalid. The tone was wrong in your post; you don't come off as a SJW. Just some guy who felt like being reasonable.

All the +1's.

Jesus Christ, when the Boz's memoirs come out that's how it needs to end.

That's ridiculous. Most enterprise applications are built directly for enterprise customers, see Microsoft (Windows Server and all its children, .Net/Visual Studio) SAP (Did they fail in the consumer arena as well?), Oracle (they're still a tier 1 ERP, tier 1 DBMS, and Java is one of the most used platforms in the…

The only way I can get the childish fanboy in me to be objective about them is to look at them and wonder "How good would they look with a Kia badge on them? Would they still be so sexy?"

I'm interested in what you mean by Hollinger: as a developer, and particularly one who started his career doing industrial statistics and data mining, I've never really thought too much about the formulas themselves. What are the flaws?

As a Chiefs fan, this was the first thing I thought of.

Well, as a Thunder fan I'm rooting for OKC-Ind. Suck it, Phoenix! Markieff is a stupid name!

By what measure are you saying "best?"

I've seen a large number of comments, many of which directly refuting the points made here through...you know...actual facts, or common sense, disappearing from the conversations. I can think of at least 5 of my own that have gone missing.

I'm just bummed because my comments keep getting deleted, while yours aren't. While it's true your points are more salient than mine, I feel like I firmly established the defect rate of this article moves it into 'defect-ridden'/Rick Reilly territory.

Defect rates are relative. People who have developed things know this, and try to plan for/around it.

Defect rates are relative, moron. You have defects in every process; your writing being a prime example.

Also, the Chinese fighters are based on fucking RUSSIAN designs. Notably, the fucking Su-33 and its variants.

Jesus fuck, no.