FeloniousReverend
FeloniousReverend
FeloniousReverend

Actually in this scenario, Asshole: Somebody who is jaded and doesn't want others to get things that they also paid for.

Sometimes life is unfair. The bottom line here is that apparently one time you needed unemployment and couldn't get it. So now you're going around calling the whole system a sham and would rather

So because you didn't get something when you needed it, nobody should? You'd rather everyone have to go through an unnecessarily tough time just like you did, then possibly benefit in the way the system is designed? You sort of sound like an asshole.

I think you misunderstood the intention behind blind2reply's comment. They're saying that previously they were surprised by posts like this that explained what seem at face value to be simple concepts, but everyone else seemed impressed/amazed by. They've since realized that given all of the examples in their second

No. If you read the article, it's very clearly stated that "Kwapik and Kelly allegedly engaged in a sex act with the girl while Modaffare took a picture without her knowledge or consent."

(Emphasis mine, since it apparently wasn't clear enough without it.)

Battlefield 4 ($30) | Amazon

Just to be clear, while you should have calmed down as you kept reading, you probably should have just started over at the beginning of the paragraph where the author stated "The populist narrative around the first two games in the Dragon Age series, in a nutshell:" He wasn't even showing his own bias, but the same

Do you know which graphic or web design company this guy owns? I could really use his rugged individualism when designing my next social marketing app. I bet he really knows how to take broken Apple products into the Apple store and get them fixed, if you know what I mean. (I mean he probably purchases lots of Apple

So when it's anti-gamergaters doing the doxxing it's the whole side, but if it's pro-gamergaters then it's just a couple of trolls and the movement can't be held responsible? That seems fair. Couldn't that same argument also be made about any of the abuse claims you've made coming from the anti-gamergaters, that it's

Did you even read those emails? The fact that they lead anyone to think there's some sort of massive level of collusion going on and not just people in the same field having a discussion and bouncing ideas off of each other is just impressive. There's no unifying agreement, people are both for and against ideas, a

So this happened... Luckily for you it was just a couple of bad apples and not any true members of the pro-GamerGate community... Since they're totally opposed to doxxing.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/201…

You latched onto the term thinking, without realizing my usage of that term is that they have aligned themselves with the wrong movement not that they are not fighting for ethics. You also managed to skip over my entire argument that things are better now then they've ever been in regards to "ethics".

It's my

"The problem is that anti-GamerGaters refuse to believer other than them self in this matter. They don't even want to acknowledge that there might be other people trying to derail everything. Everyone working against them is a misogynistic, nazi-terroris, belonging to ISIS. And they all belong to #GamerGate. This

Doesn't Kotaku and other gaming websites also post link to their sources and reference other articles? I'm not clear on how GGers can say Kotaku can't be trusted but individuals with zero accountability on youtube can. Also you can't really claim "GGers do not support doxing in any way" when the events the caused the

I'm sorry, are you claiming that youtubers are a more legit source of information than the gaming media?

These are the same group of people who hide under the term Critic, so they can sign press agreements and get early release copies of games under the promise of not saying anything bad about a game or showing any of

It doesn't seem like you understand the term Pyrrhic victory since you're claiming there's no really negative consequences for you. Unless you're claiming that Kotaku is on the side of right, and will eventually win, but your side will just make it extremely painful for them. Which would make it seem like you're

My problem with the movement is that GamerGaters think they are some crowdsourced investigative force for good that can root out immoral and unethical behavior and connections in the gaming press, yet can't seem to be bothered to do the same amount of work to weed out the trolls they say are such a minority in their

One of these posts is not like the other... One of these posts is about death threats. It wasn't even directed towards him, it was directed towards his wife. So I'm going to assume that was

"Just last night I deleted a youtube comment from a user who posted my home address and said he'd kill my wife and leave me to

Also, does he ever come out and say that it was an anti-gamergate person who sent him a death threat? Can you link me where that's claimed, because it would seem from the turn of events that maybe he got threatened by a gamergater since he seems to be for more integrity in gaming journalism, but also for equality in

"Columbia sure looked like a great utopia before the vox came." Point, Set, and Match.

They're clarifying that it's the GamerGate Trolls aren't they? That's them trying to identify a subgroup within the larger context. If GamerGaters don't want include people who take actions like this, then they themselves should come up with terminology to describe themselve, and should also condemn them. Universally.