FeloniousReverend
FeloniousReverend
FeloniousReverend

You clearly don't understand Feminism. The reason they can blame the "patriarchy" and also be for equality for all is because it is inherently an unequal distribution of power and creates societal norms for both males and females. I'm a male, I'm against patriarchial systems as opposed to meritocracies. I'd rather the

You didn't even read any of those articles did you? They were talking about people who consider themselves "real gamers" or "traditional gamers" in the face of an expanding number of people who are just "gamers".

Actually, the GamerGate crowd probably did.

But the problem is the group isn't condemning their actions. They come here and they say that it's unfair for the group to get judged by the vocal actions of some of their members, and how the feminists are being unfair, and crying wolf , or really just getting what they deserve. Pro-GamerGate people aren't condemning

The internet is actually the way that people communicate now, so you can't just dismiss all communication done through the internet like that. An email, from a student, was sent to the administration of UofU, that is a legitimate form of communication and contact. Also, this "boys will be boys" attitude is bullshit.

You probably aren't aware of this, but if the threats are real, then you're not really crying wolf. Unless you're trying to say that people are actually crying wolf over fake threats, because in the same sentence talk about them actually happening. Nobody would have to worry about people thinking they were crying wolf

All social media outlets could be considered "trivial," though I will say I'm a pretty tech savvy guy who uses social media, and I completely missed the twitter boat. So I can see where you are coming from. Sorry if I'm used to a lot of the negative posts on topics like this really just being attempts at attacking

You realize she had enough space to type what you put in quotes, but instead took a more informational tone. I guess that was probably part of her plan all along, to not have to use the tone you're trying to apply to her statement. She must have known you'd do it for her, and then she'd get to have her cake and eat it

Here's the deal, not every person on the planet will get a death threat, so it's possible to find famous people who didn't. Or possibly, find famous people who don't talk about getting death threats... But on the other hand this happens:
http://www.dailydot.com/entertainment/…

If no one cared enough to talk about it, how did you know it happened?

You're aware of swatting right? You admit that you believe there are gamers out there stupid enough to do this for their own entertainment, let alone because they really feel like she is attacking them. There's empirical evidence of gamers doing this sort of activity. Yet apparently since you disagree with her on some

It's pretty simple: Black men may have it worse off than white women, but black women have it even worse off than black men. That's why gender equality matters. If you want to think you stand for equality or social justice, but you don't think someone has a right to stand up for their gender, than you've got some

It's true... Government assholes have no dick.

I'm not the exact opposite of this, but my wife is kick-ass at budgeting and personal finance, and way more organized than I am. She also worries a lot more about our finances because she went through a rough financial time when she was younger. We discuss our plans for the future and trips we want to go on, or what

Actually you should always unbutton your jacket completely when sitting. Also you shouldn't have to unbutton your bottom button, because you should never button it in the first place.

You do realize that a same sex relationship would have two men or two women right? Are you just taking exception to the picture used for the article? Do you really expect them to include pictures of every possible relationship type? I only see two people in this picture, what about polyamorous relationships?

Or are you

I was going to say this exact same thing. I'm not even really a ketchup person, but this stuff is so much better than what people think ketchup is supposed to be like.

Just to be clear in defense of my stream of consciousness style of writing that you put the following in the same post: "And in the very next comment Serpenz clarified unambiguously that he/she was talking about him/herself, but you still pressed the attack because you wanted to make the point that you are a

You already admitted that my points were all valid and then claimed that it was just my tone that was unjustified. I then addressed that by explaining why I didn't feel my tone was unjustified in the first place, and was further given justification by your own tone. I don't have to defend my own points, you already

Well at this point let us agree to disagree about proper internet discourse. Though keep in mind you were the one who swooped in to white knight Serpenz over a month after the discussion was dropped. I don't think my tone was that unjustified, or at the very least that have I been more rude to either of you than you