Nope. West Coast, mostly aboard Indy, a bit on Kennedy, 92-98.
Nope. West Coast, mostly aboard Indy, a bit on Kennedy, 92-98.
This Gizmodo reader doesn't enjoy seeing inanimate objects criminalized.
Of course they exist, just not in nearly the significant numbers they used to.
1200 MPH is about Mach 1.58 over the ground. In the American inventory, only the F-5, -15, -16, -18, -22, and -35, the T-38, and the B-1 have a chance at getting that, and most of those would need a stiff, jet stream tail wind to do so.
"Putting people out of USPS jobs" is the functional equivalent of putting people out of whale oil lamp, blacksmith, and elevator operator jobs. Technology and other, better industries have rendered all of them unnecessary. As such, anyone who is desperately hanging on to his job as a postal worker is essentially…
Sovereignty. Regardless of whether or not a country is doing anything illegal, immoral, or fattening, keeping other countries from overflying its airspace is no different than its defending its borders. If a country can't keep other people (or their machines) out, its legitimacy as a sovereign nation is in question,…
Here's the link for the Xoom. Mine is working perfectly on an unrooted WiFi model.
Although I can't see how children are salient, I can report that I have three of them: 16, 14, and 12.
@CubFan99
Bullet shells? Really?
Regardless of whether pennies cost more than a cent to mint (which is a good point, in and of itself), the reason we should 86 pennies is because there is almost nothing one can buy with a penny. Why in the world would we want a unit of currency that is less than the least expensive common things?
It seem fairly obvious that the
Psst. It's a hydraulic hammer. That is all.
I was 17, and the movie cemented my boyhood desire to fly fighters. Cheers!
Unfortunately, the A-4 in the video is by no means a modern jet. Pilots of non-fly-by-wire jets can easily overstress their airframes; we did it all the time in the Tomcat. Even the electric jets can be sometimes commanded to perform beyond their software's intended limits.
Why not just a large rifle, like a .50 BMG Barrett? Put whatever tracking system on it that you were going to put on the laser and blast away. With a muzzle brake, it has about the same recoil as a 12 gauge shotgun, and it delivers over 9,000 ft-lbs of energy per shot. Plus, in space, there's no wind, bullet drop,…
"So, the numbers and the dangers still beg the question. What if?"
The reason fighters punch off their drop tanks is to reduce weight and drag on the airframe when the mission requires low weight and low drag.
It would be funny right up until you get accidentally knocked unconscious and declared dead at the scene.
I like the idea, but would like to have it extend to feedback regarding the car's performance.