They're desperate and trying anything to make her look bad.
ExtraExtra
ExtraExtra
That's not wishy washy, that's being a reasonable, smart person. Stating "X is true, period." is arrogant even if true. She's saying she's not aware of any link because science changes, new studies are done, etc.
Why does she have to? She's already said she's for them multiple times.
She clearly believes in science, supports vaccines and her response was mostly "people don't trust big pharma/the FDA/etc." which is true. You're making a mountain out of a molehill on this one, but Gawker seems to want to throw anything at the wall to see if it sticks to make people not vote for her.
She already clearly stated vaccines are necessary for the public health. Why people keep saying she hasn't is confusing as hell.
If that's true, Dems and Republicans have a hell of a lot more weirdos by sheer numbers.
She already said she's for vaccines, she doesn't need to grunt and say "Vaccines, GOOD" like some people seem to want.
Reddit's voting system sucks.
It’s entirely invalid because you’re attempting to compare “soft” racism, to what she said. There is literally no connection or comparison there. It’s like saying the clouds are like the cars on the highway. You’re desperately attempting to connect two wildly disparate things and for some reason in your brain they…
Thing is, I'm clearly not upset despite you repeating that I am. Does saying you said something idiotic mean someone is upset now? Interesting. Your comparison to racism doesn't fit at all, and you're trying so hard to make it work too. You're swinging and missing all over this one buddy, and you type too much with…
It sure isn't me, considering your mountain into a molehill stance here. I can continue saying your interpretation of what she said is clearly off base.
Applebees has a Chicken/Mac and Cheese dish that's close to 2,000 calories by itself.
Upset? Nope, just a silly out of bounds attempt at a comparison that didn't work at all. "I'm not aware of" is a smarter way to put it, because no one person knows everything. You guys are straight up making things up to justify your bias, it's creepy, and I'm not even voting for her.
You'll read whatever you want into what she says, but none of it was anti-vax. At all.
She's not anti-science, at all. You guys are trying way too hard here, and then trying to compare it to racism is just bonkers.
There was no wiffle-waffing, and none of this is close to lunacy.
That's an absolutely idiotic comparison.
Considering she ran for governor, tried to get in the debates last time, etc. she clearly does try.
She doesn't "hint" at it, only idiots think she does.