EvilFD
EvilFD
EvilFD

About equal to a hand grenade. They are great penetrators on the cheap. And RPG-7 will punch through just about anything that hasn’t been specifically designed to handle them. It would punch through 99% of the Mexican government’s armored vehicles. Basically anything shy of a modern MBT with ERA. That said, I saw M1s

This is the Sinaloa cartel. I’m sure they have plenty of NODs to make use of an IR laser.

For what they’d be using that rifle for, any cheapo optic you can slide on a rail would be more than fine. It’s a pretty good anti-material rifle. It’s a horrendous anti-personnel weapon.

Source? The limited projections I’ve seen says they will have no problem with keeping pace with any changes.

Absolutely!

Not sure if srs but I’ll bite since I’ve seen people legitimately respond with that answer.

You dont seem to understand an ounce of this even after Tyler has written novels on all aspects of it.

Stellar post. Tyler does some stuff really well. Playing arm-chair general (with zero experience or background mind you) with tactical and strategic analysis isn’t one of them. As you said, he should stick to the facts.

Man you’re really reaching. Out of all the possible reasons for weapon selection you fixate on one of the least likely. What a joke.

We’re both pretty rude to each other. It evens out ;)

Do you have any clue what IOC means? Really? You do? Good, now compare the F-35’s IOC to any other IOC and you’ll notice that there is YEARS separating an IOC to any legitimate deployment.

bueno

That’s some pretty interesting “history” you subscribe to. Way to highlight 10% of things while leaving 90% out.

That insignia was in use long before the F-14.

Fair enough. I didn’t recognize your user name. Nine times outta ten when that happens, it’s someone hanging on every word Tyler types.

As you should.

Surprised they’re using the Maverick E. Collateral damage must be a non-issue for that sortie.

That still doesn’t explain why he thinks the Raptors numbers have ANYTHING to do with communications between different platforms. Real world? Are you retarded? No amount of numbers, nor wherever im “objecting” from, have anything to do with this. A million F-22s or ten, this upgrade would still be a necessity.

Tell me you’re kidding.

Eh. They could’ve built a million. In this situation it wouldn’t have done any good. This isn’t even a problem. The F-22 from the get-go was going to have one-way communications to negate emission transmissions that are detectable. More F-22s wouldn’t have changed that. You’d simply have more aircraft to bring up to a