Makes sense given they sell tons of bikes in other countries. It’s really just lost revenue for American workers though.

Essentially the same thing Hilter did. He slowly took steps of stripping the Jewish of their rights and one day started moving them to camps.

Unfortunately the only Americans who know this is coming are also likely the one’s against this trade war. The average American doesn’t care and they don’t even realize that the products we sell to other countries we either have a huge surplus of or American’s don’t consume. I have to keep explaining that no, bacon…

or lack thereof.

My comment pertained specifically to those streamers who are banned unjustly.

That is correct yet here we have YouTube and Twitch applying policies that police content for fear of being sued for user created content, which should be protected by Safe Harbor.

So how does that make it ok to ban twitch streamers who aren’t even violating copyright laws?

That doesn’t mean squat as most browsers prevent them from tracking if you aren’t on their domain.

So question: Why in the world do big media websites still continue to use auto-ban system for content that “may” be copy-written and “may” make mistakes?

Typically speaking, you don’t always want to season a burger with anything other than salt and pepper. Many top chefs follow this policy. The trick is using the correct thickness, the correct cut, and high quality meat.

The guy works for Trump, which makes him a government official. It isn’t illegal to spread a public servant’s phone number.

Yeah pretty much. There’s a simple solution to that, require a summarized version of that at the start of the EULA. Perhaps even make it separate, like for example a Data privacy agreement.

First, Kotaku only has control so far as it’s website. Even if they wanted to track your activities on other pages, most browsers default to blocking tracking cookies that collect information from non-native domains. Even if you have a browser that doesn’t , there is a bevy of add-ons that do this for you.

I’m 100% sure script blockers are popular for exactly this reason.

This wouldn’t be an issue if companies clearly stated what data they are collecting, for what reason, and properly identified the program collecting the data so people aren’t worried.

Simple transparency from the onset would have been the best course of action. Just another reason we need data privacy and transparency laws.

So given the design decisions in the game, do you think my previously suggested idea is a good one? I feel that it wouldn’t compromise the intended game play and it would partially address my initial concern.

“The fact that Mario Kart has been so enduringly popular - especially as a local multiplayer game - should be enough evidence to prove you’re wrong about it being poorly designed. It’s designed for fun”

That’s not competitive, that’s a handicap.

Someone must though right? Or else no one would be buying games just for the easy achievements and this wouldn’t be an issue.