Correction - it was ‘there’ but only when a special event wasn’t.. which was a majority of the time. in 2014 Guardians of the Galaxy had the theater for a good 8 months, then Inside Out. So I suppose you could have seen it.

Star Wars land is going to a different part of the park - not in Tomorrowland at all.

Shut Down? It hasn’t been at Disneyland for years! It was only up as a tribute for about a year+ in the 2010’s The building is there.. the attraction is not.

That was the answer I was looking for! Thanks! :)

Im just asking. I 100% get why they would be cautious. Just seems like rockets would be built to handle more.

Do astronauts stick their hand out the windows?

So for the rest of forever are we only launching space-craft in perfect weather? Built to travel thousands of miles per hour in space.. but can’t take rain?

May be a silly question - but what happens if they launch in a rainstorm. Is a giant multi-billion project really at the mercy of raindrops?

now THATS a good question! Theres also the inevitable brand loyalty. ‘I don’t trust [Apple, Google, Tesla] cars, they crash too much’

This is becoming a standard now. V2V communications : http://www.safercar.gov/v2v/index.html

Very true! Misread that ;) But, yes.. signal noise is a valid concern.

Lidar can be hacked with an arduino and a laser pointer.

How about a feature that doesn't tell me to make a left hand turn into 4 lanes of oncoming Los Angeles traffic... that would be great!

So we built this full working rocket, and then never did anything with it..... yea.....

And actually, your insurance CAN go up if you live around nothing but Ferrari... zip code based insurance is real... your neighbors all drive more expensive cars.. your cost goes up. You only have a GED and your neighbor has a PHD, your cost is higher.

So.. as you said.. ‘based on the safety of your vehicle’ ... and as technology improves safety the outdated vehicles become more expensive to insure.

Nows your chance to voice you opposition. This stuff is in legislation now, today, its happening.

Not True, your 87 accord is now more expensive to insure as the payouts increase. Your not paying insurance for you, your paying insurance for who you potentially hit. Replacing a bumper on an 87 Accord is cheap.. replacing a bumper on a robot car with sensor arrays gets expensive. If robot car cannot hit robot car,…

Zero Fatalities? Where do you get that number from a non existent product? Zero as yet, but then again.. theres what 30 of these cars on the road now?

Consider this - Insurance companies will deem ‘human’ drivers inefficient and therefor more expensive to insure. Meaning you can keep you 87 Accord on the road - but your insurance will be $4,000 a month vs Automated car. Its not price to the customer thats an issue, its price to insure... and that... you don't…