+1
+1
Right, yes, because the Bills are a terrible football team that is really bad at defense.
ha ha. Hi there. Di Maria should've buried his chance too
This is great Bobby. Now would you please give Tim Sherwood a call and read this post to him over the phone really, really slowly?
I'm as butthurt as anybody about the MLS bashing but give it a rest man. Save it for the Billy Haisley posts at least.
puns on a serious article like this? smh Uganda be kidding me
+1
Absolutely. Good advocacy.
This is true, but describing the absurd and intrusive rules in exquisite detail is also a strategy of stoking outrage about the treatment of the plaintiffs. (And it's a good move—the rules are outrageous!)
It sounds pretty bad, but the Bills are going to throw their best defense at this, so there's no chance the cheerleaders won't win.
It's nice to see Gimli son of Glóin get some time to relax and take in a ball game.
+1
They have google back in 1983?
Pretty hypocritical for Cowherd to be against dancing on the job when he's always doing The Jerk at work.
lol don't tempt me
Can a subject really be "thoughtful"? :/
Drew, your health care expenses should be paid out of pre-tax dollars smdh
That's not a convincing argument. Let me demonstrate by analogy: I haven't seen the results of any official tests, but I can state with great confidence that you are a blithering idiot.
wtf that makes even less sense
Hey, I recognize this reference! South Park, right?