You don't have to be very muscular, it's just a natural build for some people. My back is similar to that and I'm pretty slim (but toned.) I actually was a bit self conscious about it for a while, once I realized most people don't have it.

A lot of guys like tan lines. It's one of the tackier fetishes, definitely

Lui is a fap magazine.

We have plenty of magazines with naked ladies on the covers in the US?

Have you seen the Pour It Up video, though? At the end she's face down, ass up, twerking. It's pretty porny because Rihanna is pretty porny.

Okay embarrassed I didn't know it was that old? I only know it because all of my hypebeast friends wear it.

I'm not convinced she isn't a group effort. The stussy shirt is just toooo relevant

Yes I know, that's exactly what I suggested.

This doesn't say they can't feel or express guilt. It only says that the (extremely small) study shows people tend to attribute the reaction to guilt when it it was a reaction to the owner's tone of voice. This newer article in the NYT talks about dogs having the sentience of very young children.

They have some idea of right and wrong, though right? Or at least 'allowed and not allowed.' I never yelled at my dog, but I always knew when she'd pissed somewhere in the house, because as soon as I walked into the room, her tail would go between her legs and she wouldn't look at me. She definitely wasn't reacting…

I hate gospel too, but I'd have probably just knocked him unconscious?

But he *did* have sex with a woman legally unable to consent. All of your arguments are whether or not he knew, but whether or not he knew doesn't determine whether it was rape. In most states, having sex with someone who is nearly or completely incapacitated from any substance is rape. It may not be forcible rape…

You realize there are very fews ways to 'absolutely prove' most rape? Murder, yes, because murder isn't an issue of whether or not the other person wanted to be murdered. But rape is when two people are involved in a very common activity under very specific circumstances. That's why it's so hard to prove unless we're…

holy shit, can I steal this. Thread over.

I remember whipping out my algebra book in middle school and teaching my five year old sister how to solve a basic equation. I now work with kids in early language acquisition and I think people really take for granted how quickly they learn. They may not know as much as us, but their brains are amazing as far as…

Disgusted they use the formal title standard in their culture instead of the formal title (Dad is title) standard in yours? Also, I'm sure they use both. They aren't likely to call 'Sir' when they need something from him. They probably call him Daddy.

It's funny how many people can't discern he's southern from his accent. A lot of the comments said 'maybe he's from the south'. Maybe? He's so twangy, there's no maybe about it.

You sound like a clown tbh

Sir is formal, but 'dad' is a title as well. Unless you think kids should call their parents by their first names, you're only suggesting one title over the other based on how you're used to hearing them. That's cultural bias.

Have to agree here. I've never considered myself Southern, but spent a good amount of my formative years in MD and have heard plenty of people address their parents as ma'am and sir. On the other side of the equation, I have friends who address their parents by their first names. That shocked me a little, but my point…