I’m assuming this is damning with faint praise.  And as such, you get a star.

But why does this look so awesome, and the Baby Bronco not?

What I don’t understand is how on one hand we get this, which looks great.
And on the other, we get the design compromised Bronco Sport.

We’re aware Halo is 18 years old right?

A bit odd that I can’t see any sort of sneaking in these missions, sense that was my impression was Ghosts main thing.

I don’t disagree, the question is how much it further they eat into Expedition sales.

The new Expedition for the first time in a decade has a nicer interior than the current GM trucks IMO.

As a Toyota guy, isn’t the dream a new engine for the Sequoia and the Tundra that doesn’t cost as much in fuel as the 5.7L?

Oh yeah, but in 2003-2006 I think the Expedition was a better purchase than the GM trucks for a couple of reasons.

My first comment should have said 2007-2018.

I’d usually a second gen Expedition over a ninth gen Suburban, but a 10th gen suburban over a 3rd gen Expedition. When comparing the 3rd gen Expy to the 10th…

I wonder how much IRS might crunch Expedition sales.

If you listen to his director’s commentary on Fast and the Furious this isn’t surprising.

The Blue Angels do that in quite a few of their shows.

The FAA would never let this fly in the United States.

Could be a large number of states:
- Arizona
- Montana
- Idaho
- Wyoming
- New Hampshire
- Florida
- Texas
- and many more.

A number of Tim Horton’s just suck at drivethru performance.

Same here. I’ve been able to take any number of my dad’s cars out for a rip, or for dates and the like.

Even now, I’ve got an S1000RR, but I still take his RS for a spin when I don’t feel like driving my truck or the bike.

So is this pretty much the anti 3.5?

The 3.5L is a rocket ship in a street truck, but towing shows the reason why this 7.3L will be so great.

This also happened during the Democalypse of 2016.

I think a large part of it is that the Republicans have had a strong focus on candidates reaching all the way down to school boards.

The Democrats have focused heavily on the Presidency and key Senate races running on their stars.

I don’t think the Democrats have the…

You’re right. In contemporary times, the size of the seat swing in the mid-terms certainly wasn’t unprecedented.

George W Bush faired well in his first midterm, but 9/11 and the GWOT make it somewhat incomparable. In his second midterm he lost 27 seats and control of the house.

That and staunch progressivism is highly localized, as is staunch conservatism.

You will see really progressive candidates such as any of the squad or Bernie totally electable in some districts, but that doesn’t mean the same policies can win across the nation.

Similarly, people like Gowdy, Nunes, Gaetz or McConnell can…

That’s not what POSOTUS is saying though. It isn’t for lack of effort or trying, it’s the fact that any candidate has to win the middle.

A candidate with Bernie and/or AOC like policies loses the middle as soon as the opposition says: “1 trillion dollars”.