No, it is not a reasonable response, unless you're a psychopath. Here's a quick test: was something wrong the first time? Then it's ALSO wrong the second time.

Mrs. Doubtfire's physique was modeled on our bubbes.

Seriously. My mother's mother's mother is the Russian born (okay, okay, Ukranian) person from whom I inherited a) my Slavic appearance, b) my big ass, c) my in-the-Jewish-club qualifications.

I guess your mom works harder than mine does! (In truth, she probably does, but not because of butt size.)

Hah. If there were no big-assed Jews, most of my family wouldn't exist.

I agree. Negative attention seems to spur him to further depths.

I'm confounded that they keep reinstating him. I'm not, actually, his tweets get a lot of attention.

The man is either deranged or doing a very good impression for the attention.

This isn't Johnson's first rodeo. He's absolutely vile. He's been banned from Twitter for posting personal information, repeatedly.

I pointed you to a study, with numbers and further references to other studies. I work in the expert witness field, and we would use studies like this as part of our opinion in front of a judge.

I wasn't suggesting anything like that. All of my links show that rape is routinely mishandled or not investigated by law enforcement. The excerpt is from a study showing that officers who believe the myth that rape is rare are more likely to inappropriately close a case or/and fail to investigate it... at all.

It's naive to assume that the police would not investigate if he was accused of rape?

But whenever women come forward there are people (cough) waiting to say "not proved yet." Which is odd, because they don't seem to come out of the woodwork whenever anyone is accused of crimes like murder, or drunk driving, or fucking in a public pool. In those cases, mug shots are plastered all over the press,…

Most reports of rape are not charged. Half of rapes that are charged are not convicted.

No, that's not the REASON, that's the EXCUSE.

Given that victims are afraid to come forward because of social, economic, and psychological reprisals, given that victims are often disbelieved or/and encouraged not to pursue charges by universities and law enforcement (often describing coming forward as being as or more traumatic than the original assault), given…

You are a full of shit racist coward. Full stop.

He wasn't a thug, he was a human being. Your choice to intentionally dehumanize him tells us everything we need to know about your bias and how you arrived at the conclusion you did. Please take a long time to consider what made you into the kind of person who dehumanizes strangers based on ... the color of their…

The forensic evidence says nothing of the sort. Absolutely nothing. Some witnesses, including Wilson, claim that, while other witnesses claim something completely different. This is why a trial would have been useful, to sort through the contradictory testimony.

I was thinking about that, too. What should someone do if they find out their child spoke to a victim that way?