I don’t have a soul, you’re right, but that’s only because such things don’t exist. :P

Hopefully.

Which doesn’t make them moral. It, hopefully, makes them popular, which then translates into more sales. That’s still not morality, unless you’re willing to say that you can put a price on doing the right thing.

Fantastic PR.

Sure, as long as we’re making arguments, then, that can be argued.

And, fine, but the end result is that 3rd party passengers (who may support, oppose, or be indifferent to the ban) are actually being punished, to send a message to yet another 3rd party, namely Trump. But, the action is in support of a cause we agree with, so, we’ll ignore those people and call it good.

Depends. Is there effective competition?

That’s still not morality. It’s calculus regarding long term client relationships. It looks like morality, but is not.

That’s why I put that up the way it is phrased. Figured I could get some additional insight.

Look, I see your point...but companies are amoral. They provide a service. Sure, the CEO’s a dick, etc. etc., but the company as a whole...is just doing business. Which, granted, can justify a whole lot of fucked up BS in other contexts...

Sir, if you’re shooting marbles...you should see a doctor.

But...can you put marbles in? I mean, duh, you can. Should you?!

*replies from a fetal position:

I’ll bite. (Phrasing!)

Ochen harasho.

...Had a baby with a Merc and a Zil limo.

So, let’s say that a war does break out.

You’d be asking damning questions of yourself?

How dare you cover politics on your early morning news roundup? Just show me car pics.

Diminishing marginal utility of income ftw!