I still prefer aardvarks

are you sure about the dates on Do Androids...? I have a Signet paperback 1st edition dated 1969 with a 75 cent price point, which states it is an authorized reprint of a hardback original.

not to be a wet blanket, but does anyone in the book bother to explain how in the time it took Han, Leia & co to get to the (much closer) Cloud City, walk around then get captured, Luke made a longer trip to a remote planet and spent days (weeks? months?) training to be a Jedi before running off to rescue them?

@gd01skorpius: it's a teaser trailer which means the final sound mix is no where close to being complete. Teaser trailers generally use music and sound effects from other films.

@chalkshark: the time difference is a large part as well. recasting a film character in a series was traditionally not an issue because it would anywhere from a year to 3 years between the original actor and the replacement - plenty of time for the audience to forget the specifics of the role. In TV, it's 3 months…

what is this Matrix sequel of which you speak? I remember no such thing ever existing, recast or otherwise.

is it "recasting" when you cast someone in a *new* version of a show? Shouldn't a list like this focus on actors who were specifically replaced during the course of one series? Charlie followed this rule, but the commentators don't seem to get it.

what is getting lost this year is the other big change in voting. Everyone is focused on the change to 10 nominees but the more significant change is the implementation of a point system. No longer will the film with the most 1st place votes win, but the film with the most overall consensus. A film with few…