There's that old saying that dating services add 2 inches of height and $20k in salary to a man.

Well, while he's not the first person to confuse the Onion with a real news source, considering his deep interest in Planned Parenthood this article offers plenty of clues that would tip off someone. For instance, PP doesn't call their clinics "abortion clinics," they call them health clinics. So calling a massive…

I used to have an autonomous roaming heater, but then we broke up and she moved to a different city. I miss that little heater. :-(

90% of comments = quality of the video, little or no discussion of concept

I like the mental image of 4-feet of headphone cord dangling off your goggles.

I've never heard of sweat pants that wear lawyers! Crazy.

... but in the video they say "missing half of the right wing." So, there you go. One of each.

Spaniard?

Hmm... and yet people who insult the palette of others and tell them what ought to taste better to them always come across as pretentious douchebags. Like the best beer, the best whisky is the whisky you want.

You know who does? South Korea's got Seoul, that's who.

God I hate the iPhone/everything else debate. And the Mac/PC debate. Utterly, utterly useless rivalry.

I know. I saw them. I just take the position that if you ignore red/unapproved commenters they are, for all intents and purposes, not there.

It also occurred to me, when I went back up, that Joel didn't write this endorsement. Matt Buchanan did, he just quoted Joel's feelings about the sustainability of materialism.

Unfortunately, Verite isn't on there, but you can always check a charity out on [www.charitynavigator.org]

If you hadn't approved the comment it would have stayed red and non-starred commenters wouldn't have been able to see it. You've just subjected them to the spam. :-P

Hmm... saying "I don't like you, and therefore don't find your endorsement encouraging," is different from apparently just ignoring whatever charities he brings to light. The first still allows you to make your own judgment about the charity. The second means, even if he points out a charity that you might have…

I doubt it. Mostly because drooling is uncouth. Plus, on the internet everyone's a player. I think the general sense here is the same one 20-ish people got when talking about how they've never had a hangover in a previous post about some god-awful drink made with beer and Everclear. You're young, enjoy it now, things…

How very convenient for you. "I can ogle women because they must want it!" You assume that men ogle women because they use their sexuality "to manipulate men." Are we then to assume that men at some point didn't ogle women - why, it never occurred to them! - and then women bollocksed the whole thing up by showing some…

That sounds like it's begging to be photoshopped...

Hey, Jimmy Wales even warned students on Twitter to get their homework done early because Wikipedia would be down tomorrow. They're looking out for us!