Yeah, not fun in campaign, even if it has the best feedback in history. Ultimately choose to go with shotguns I felt were better.

Almost had the Gnasher, but decided against it for a bunch of reasons.

It rewards creative, not efficient play. Something I had to learn while playing.

They have to be modified to flip with a much bigger lever, and it is extremely dangerous, hence unrealistic.

I thought about it, but I try to avoid negativity when I can.

Wolfenstein: The Old Blood, a prequel to The New Order released in May. Soft reboot of Return to Castle Wolfenstein.

Close. It’s Wolfenstein: The Old Blood. Chapter 8, I think. I took the screen back in May.

Yup

I wrote it, he posted it. You can see all my stuff under the gbb tag.

Nothing in particular was better than anything I felt should go on the list. I thought about including something, but none stuck out to me.

A real shotgun should be just as effective at that range.

Exactly. A shotgun should be ohk in melee range and 2 to 3 hits beyond that. In conquest in battlefield, I used it lots to scatter people off points, which is what it excels at.

Shotguns should be point clearers. Bad Company 2 was really good at this.

I really like the movies despite realizing that they are terrible. I use hyperbolic language to be silly because it amuses the fuck out of me.

That would be the first and only reason not to like these masterpieces.

It’s not like they co-wrote the movie. When you see 5-6 people on a script, it usually means that someone wrote one, then other people came along and butchered it, then even more people came along and butchered it more, and hopefully somewhere in the process it became good.

Roberto Orci is a frequent screenwriting collaborator of his, and he’s a bad writer.

He can absolutely do substance, but he really likes to work with bad writers.

I haven’t seen them, so I couldn’t possibly comment, but I’m a guy on the internet, so I’m totally gonna do it:

In a world... where J.J. Abrams makes movies without Orci...