Wait, so are those droplets moving or are they suspended? I gather they are moving but appear suspended based on the description of this being a "trick."

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit

Cue hip-hop artists in 3...2...1...

Yup I think youre right, and I was doing so well with it all - until twitter came along.

I fear, because if its popularity, that sometime soon I'm going to have to find some tweener to "explain" twitter to me b/c I still don't quite 'get it' - in fact I can't even understand/read a lot of the tweets in the news because they are links or something.

He likely does not "have to" give him notice. But if he does, the cop cannot later in court ATTEMPT to say he did not have notice should that be an issue.

See above. If asked nicely its no problem.

read above

No, not at all. If the person is polite, etc. and asks nicely, it's no problem and I am happy to comply. But when they bark orders, I am less than helpful, esp. if they have no legal basis whatsoever for being a jerk. And if youve dealt with these movie folks often, as we do here, you'd know what I mean.

Lol. You'll be arrested. And your video will likely be used to help convict you. And then you'll be on national TV as one of those "idiots" that recorded themselves committing a crime.

The only thing that you would be wise to do in that situation is provide "notice" that you are recording. For example, reply "I am recording the conversation as well." He has now provided consent (because he is recording) and you have provided notice - later in court he cannot claim lack of knowledge (notice) or…

Slightly tangential, but also of note - is to be cognizant of the "authority" (or lack thereof) of someone who is talking to you, who is giving you "orders."

very punny

Oh, facebook wasnt related to this article? I'm sorry, I thought I saw it in um, oh yeah, the first paragraph.

Some of the bills go further than merely "pre employee screening." Did you even read the rfirst sentence of this article?

Well if the DC folks have common sense, they will PUBLICIZE the event very well before it occurs so folks aren't surprised, rather than keep it super secret like the NYC AF1 event - which was totally the wrong approach.

No, I clearly do understand. Some employers want access to social media accounts of employees because some employees upload material that is deemed disagreeable or problemativ to the employer or to other employees. There are oodles of news reports of said uploads that have led to the password requests.

Just ban FB URL (among others) from worker's desk PC, thats what we had to do.

that must be it, 3 and 6ft works fine, no luck on 10ft

Related: Why does my new iPad charge with a 6ft USB cord (b/w the wall wart and the iPad) but not with a 10ft USB cord? I cant figgur' that one out.