As a white-looking Asian person, I'm kinda okay with it tbqh

I thought it was about people planning and throwing a surprise party-type wedding for two unexpecting, commmitted-but-not-married SOs. Which would be horrible and hilarious.

Oh my god... It's not fugly!!! Sure, the cover lines are a little busy, but I've seen just so many plus-size mags that just look like WordArt vommed all over them, so this is really exciting.

I stand corrected. "I am choosing to interpret a line in a movie in a way that makes me angry, and will laugh at you for not interpreting that line in the same way."

"I am choosing to interpret a line in a movie in a way that justifies my anger."

I honestly think it's been associated with being full of onesself, vain, or shallow as soon as it became a thing that a lot of women did. Which is telling...

This seems to me like more of a problem with a certain subset of selfies than with selfies in general, though? Surely you have seen selfies that have been taken in a living room, on public transit, outdoors, etc.?

I don't really understand. Do you have an objection to anybody taking a photo of their own face? I feel like "selfie" is a much broader category than "duck lips" to be annoyed with.

"Crazy" would probably be more like 狂ってる or 頭が変. バカis basically "stupid."

Maybe he grew up around Nikkei kids? I'd be a sad-sack embittered misogynist asshole, too, if my last name were literally the Japanese word for "stupid."

I like the cover photo! It hints at a smile, and I like smiles. (I am obviously a simple woman who could never Vogue.)

Not to be confused with two vaginas, which is the Frottage badge.

Up to a certain decibel level, totally. I love my SO's little kitten snores.

I LOVED Anthro back when I shoplifted. :)

Dungeons & Dragons is not people. It's a product. People who play Dungeons & Dragons are people, but I didn't see him say anything particularly heinous about D&D nerds.

There is no need to take this so personally. I legit don't know what you would expect from Ice-T.

I play Pathfinder weekly and fully recognize that that shit is silly as fuck.

Hmm, I didn't see a "perfectly valid" reply. I did dismiss a reply of yours that 1) held Janet Mock more responsible for her off-the-cuff responses than Piers Morgan for the talking points he prepared ahead of time, and 2) made up some hateful shit about her. Is that the reply you were talking about?

A break? A reporter refuses to do even 30 seconds of Googling or have his team fact-check his talking points, thereby literally failing to do his job as a reporter. Who's the one who needs a break, here?