Keith Olbermann's segment on Ray Rice was strong, indignant TV, resonant with everyone who believes a two-game…
You know, if you just work from home with Google, you can avoid all this nonsense.
What? Quake II, Quake III: Arena and Return to Castle Wolfenstein exist and are proper Windows games. And what do you mean by "The new wolf looks good but it's not out"? It's most definitely out and has been since may.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/201810/
The article is archived for all to see, along with the original, main comments from the piece. The archive is linked to at the bottom of the new version.
In their defense, the io9 article header is the same way, and I posted the exact same thing.
This is exactly what I was thinking. Why does it have to specify that he's black. It's like that is the only defining characteristic of Sam. It's insulting to the audience and to the character.
Um... cool? Why is this major news? There has been a black Captain America in the past. It's not like Marvel is breaking new ground here. Between this and the female Thor announcement, I feel like we're in some time warp where racial and sexual equality are brand new ideas. Have we really regressed so far that stuff…
Fixed. What is with all this click bait headlines lately?
....but the first cover is gorgeous.
Why is it that people who preach diversity and equality still label men as black? The Falcon is replacing Rogers. A friend. A warrior. A fighter with the same or close values as Rogers. So many other defining qualities to describe this change other than a mans skin color.
I would wait to see the art inside the cover first. Zub linked some of the concept stuff on twitter earlier and it looked very similar to the stuff you'd see in a dnd manual. The cover art of comics can often be very misleading of the interior art.
No, it's not. This article is pure libel and slander, and you should be ashamed that you allowed a piece like this to be published on Kotaku.
It might be a good addition to the collective thinking insofar as an examination of personal bias affecting judgement; but it is by no means an example of objective, responsible journalism fostering intelligent debate or discussion. I realize this is an opinion piece, but frankly, Hernandez' piece is a thinly-veiled…
Please do something about this article. The way she wrote it makes it seem like he's in the wrong for trying to defend himself. Sounds like she wants him to make the focus more on the subject of rape instead of being on the defensive. I mean, look at all comments made about the article and see which comments are being…
It can be a decent conversation but Patricia does nothing to start one except denigrating a person's apology and its defense, calling parts of it gross, useless and insufficient which is, until the person in question is proven guilty, a despicable thing to do, it's just disgusting and morally questionable if not wrong.