You'd think somebody who knows what the 'naturalistic fallacy' is would also recognise when they were making a giant ad hominem, or at least failing to read an article properly.

That's... not a contradiction of anything.

"saying that "humans have stopped evolving physically and genetically" strikes me as quite uninformed scientifically (stupid, really)."

So basically the idea was that eating too much was correlated with gaining weight, and skipping breakfast was correlated with eating too much?

Yeah I was pretty distracted by how it seemed to be a man for half of the video.

I really hate people who make this comment. They're all over the internet and I hate them all, I really do. He was funny and he's at perfect liberty to be so. You are whiny. You're also at perfect liberty to be so, but we'd all like it if you stopped.

Good point. This is like calling word recognition a 'sixth sense'. No, that's a function performed upon hearing and vision. Senses are a means of getting different types of data into your head, not manipulating it when it's there.

I know nothing about Star Trek, and I knew nothing about this film except you lot going on about how unequivocally awful it was, until I watched it last night. I actually thought it was pretty enjoyable. As a sanity check I looked up some reviews and they were good too. Far better than, say, Star Wars I to III - so…

These are horrible.

Could you be a bit less clear please?

...ha?

This article really doesn't describe how we stopped believing in Martians.

Huh? Are those floors literally empty or what?

When humans finally travel to Mars, what will their first buildings look like?

That's pretty witty for a console peasant.

Riddick was never good. Jesus, please stop telling us how Riddick was good.

Salvador Dali in the 1970s. How avant garde.

Mick Jagger really isn't 'prog rock', let alone Salvador Dali.

That's a legitimate enough theme. And really, any Terminator sequel is going to suffer from the same criticism. How were the plot and villain so risible?