Yeah, for real! Stupid whores, trying to make money on the game they made. What WHORES.

They're all protected. That's what a trademark is.

Taxes pay for lots of stuff. Doesn't mean we have any degree of ownership over it. It doesn't even imply that we are allowed to USE it. It doesn't even imply that we are allowed to KNOW ABOUT IT.

When the best market for a product is one that you have virtually no prior exposure to, you're taking a risk by investing in it. Especially if the market that you're targeting is SMALLER than your usual primary market.

How can we simultaneously be blind to the outside world AND be the world police? Unless we're some kind of zany all-blind police force (I smell a Jackie Chan movie here...).

NO. The game industry does NOT need a grunge movement. Even in music, grunge's most iconic figure shot himself in the face because he knew how bad grunge sucked. He regretted everything. Even LIFE. Is that what you want for games? IS IT?

Heh, well if you're simply going to discount anything someone says because they're conservative in some regards, then I guess that makes you the stereotypical liberal.

I am disputing that what you presented is a history book. History books are supposed to be devoid of opinions. And for the record, I never made the claim that my opinion is more valid.

HAHAHAHAHAH. Now THAT'S a funny joke. This book is anything but a history book. Page 204 does support your claims made above, but ONLY if you believe that when somebody is voting for "state's rights" they're secretly voting for racism, and after having read a few of the surrounding pages, that seems to be the…

It's not a matter of taste, it's a matter of being able to set aside subjective factors and analyze a game on its technical merits — both for gameplay and for technology.

What's so strange, here? You're acting like I'm asking you to prove God exists or something. This isn't that complicated. You said it was stated in "history books" and then you said it was "confirmed"...

Your original tone was not humorous. It was snarky, dismissive, and condescending. Humor played no part in it.

I completely agree. The best thing we can do is make sure that future generations are fully aware of the scope of these crimes so that they might not be repeated. I'm just saying that assigning blame to living Japanese citizens doesn't factor into that teaching at all.

That's adorable! You said it was in "history books... yes it is... confirmed." — go ahead and give me a link to the actual text in a history book that agrees with what you just said. You can't, by the way. Look at the "Talk" section of that wiki article you cited — it explains quite well how the entire article is…

All of the countries on that list higher than the United States DO have something in common — their disposable income is vastly inferior and their populations are all less than 1/10th the size of the US population. This is literally the EXACT claim I was making. Thank you for proving it.

The crimes and prejudices of modern-day citizens definitely needs to be addressed when it occurs. But right now I thought we were talking about the crimes of past generations in WWII.

Dude, that was hilarious. I'm gonna print it up and put it on my refrigerator. You are absolutely adorable!

When people online tell me that they're gonna rape my mom to death or some shit, I just ignore them. If they keep doing it, then I mute them. If they spam my inbox, then I report them for spamming.

Link?

Good players aren't supposed to lose to cheese. The better player won the match.