Kinda weird though...truthfully Brat Pitt doesn't really do high budget action flicks.

I know what you meant. I just was just turning your argument against you.

I have completely enjoyed brainstorming a way to actually compromise on this. I've liked entertaining the idea, that would say, "we get unfettered access to the first four and a half months of pregnancy, and we'll concede the last half as un-viable"

I kind of think that this is a cop-out. Voting is important. Who we elect is important. I would like to think that Gizmodo, would be able to champion a candidate they perceive as being the most important in aspects related to technology and science.

Thanks!

If you criticize grammar and readability can you at least write a decent sentence?

That's great.

Yes, I've brought this up in some of my replies.

But it is up for debate. There are cells everywhere. They fall off. They live and they die. There are cells that are one type of cells. That get transformed into other type of cells. You specifically mentioned mutations. So is every unique mutation a new life?

I did the hard work and look through all of your comments, most of them saying "look at my other comments", to find something you said. And that still doesn't make my comment any less legitimate even if you don't want to respond to it.

You interpret the bible one way, other people interpret it a different way, I interpret it a different way or don't consider it at all. Abortion isn't even mentioned in the bible. It's your interpretation about when life begins and your opinion about god.

Isn't each cell genetically unique? If there is no brain, heart, or anything, it's just lumps of cells. You have billions of unique cells dying every day. That's billions of abortions!

Yes, you disagree. But I don't think they were defending that point of view, just explaining how conservatives view the issue and where the debate comes from.

Lunar is on the iphone!?!

You want options, I just want one thing that works, when I want it to work, and for what I want. And there's no real reason why that shouldn't exist.

People will get used to it

Why would they be ripped apart? Have you seen an example when another company was ripped apart?

I mostly don't care. There is so much data out there on us, that it's essentially meaningless. Millions of people, with thousands of small data points, with things like whether or not I like Geico commercials.

Here's that study: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2019628,00.html

More like, nice app for people who have friends on facebook who use fb events.