Here is what Activision *thinks* will happen:

Why do you think? There are entire political movements that live off of the ignorance that thrives among people such as Rusty.

Ignorance isn’t a mental illness. Not yet anyway.

Sympathy? No, you should feel sorry for him or pity him perhaps but no sympathy.

Ignorance can go a long way, and the worst part is that in this whole “war on terror” campaign that is being run. People forget what it is a terrorist does.

Thus tying back into the psychological impact and association of the colour red.

All good lies are a manipulation of truth or facts.

Something going wrong once harms your ability to trust all related cases?

Can someone with the proper knowledge of cars chime in whether there is ANY truth or factual grounds for this being the case?

Getting “mad” because other developers follow the trends isn’t understandable at all. Instead of trying to fling mud they should be proving their own product better. If, as they believe, they are better because they were there first it should be a simple matter of making their game better and thus win the entire issue…

Feels plausible? Hardly. It just has a more gritty paintjob - beyond that it is in no way more (or less) plausible.

Haven’t we seen this discussion before? Like when dozens of “minecraft clones” popped up, and whenever any other flavor of the month genre hit paydirt and dozens of clones popped up trying to replicate similar experiences to greater or lesser degrees of success?

As horrible (and hilarious) as it is that this is a thing? It is far worse that despite these things he is kept in a position of power. Thus reflecting on the intent and nature of the system as a whole - or at the very least those with means to influence it.

Depends on the kind of orange (where its from etc) and how ripe it is. Some you can tear with your hands without squishing them others you need something sharper to puncture.

Dark Souls is pretty easy if you know what to do and when to do it... The game punishes recklessness and rewards a procedural approach.

They “finished*” it.

Skimming the book? More like flipping from the first to last page without even skimming.

I love how they consider it “beating the game” when in reality they just reached the final story segment or a similarly defined moment within the game through glitches and exploits (plus a little creative thinking and probably planning).

Releasing new content is how they keep people engaged - else most people lose interest and drift off to other new games. That’s how the market is these days.

Within their contractual conditions? Yes.