Danation13
Danation13
Danation13

The wood itself, but I do agree that context matters. I tend to work on small things that get handled a lot (small boxes, bowls, rings, etc.)

I see this advice fairly frequently, but I don’t get it. When I’m done with 220, the lines really bother me.

I basically do this same thing with a Fidelity account. I have a certain amount in pretty low risk Treasury Bond ETFs as my “emergency fund”.

I believe you. My point is just that I can’t trust the Amazon review score at all.

I believe you. My point is just that I can’t trust the Amazon review score at all.

Heads up on that GlowBowl... It has a ton of “I received this product in exchange for an unbiased review” reviews. Which basically ruins the credibility for me.

Heads up on that GlowBowl... It has a ton of “I received this product in exchange for an unbiased review” reviews.

I do something similar to this. I tend to buy stuff online a fair amount, so to limit myself, I have a once a month “Amazon Day”.

It makes it so much more obvious how much I’m really spending. $10 here and there doesn’t seem significant until you’re considering a bunch at once. I find myself removing things from my

For sure. You need at least one John Petrucci solo in a “legendary” list.

I think Stool Stool would be awesome, actually. Haha.

I think Stool Stool would be awesome, actually. Haha.

I agree. I’m also wondering if a grill regains its temperature faster.

I noticed this on my own credit score and started paying off my cards weekly. That solved the problem and boosted my score by about 40 points.

I have pretty specific tastes, and I like controlling the availability of my own media, so I still buy physical media most of the time.

I like that: “Set it, but never forget it.” It’s what I do as well.

For one thing, you can spend less money. Sure, some people already spend the minimum possible, but those people are in the minority and aren’t really the target for these articles.

Originally, no. But after working there a while, I negotiated up. It worked out pretty well, to be honest.

It is obvious to anybody with intelligence that “you” in the title refers to the Lifehacker audience in general.

If you were confused, or if you felt there was ambiguity, the article made it abundantly clear exactly what the intent was. If you were still confused, I explained it. Twice.

It is obvious to anybody with intelligence that “you” in the title refers to the Lifehacker audience in general.

If

You are grasping at the most utterly moronic straws. Pointing out your lack of intelligence and poor grammar isn’t even remotely related to comparing you to Hitler. Do you even know what Godwin’s law is?

You are grasping at the most utterly moronic straws. Pointing out your lack of intelligence and poor grammar isn’t

Your grammar is bad, your logic is bad, and your humor is bad. Give it up, dude.

Your grammar is bad, your logic is bad, and your humor is bad. Give it up, dude.

1) There are three claims, and you asserted that only one was correct. Two are undeniable and one is pretty clear.

1) There are three claims, and you asserted that only one was correct. Two are undeniable and one is pretty clear.

I tried the Voyage and was pretty disappointed. The Paperwhite was definitely a better value, so I got that instead.