One can only wonder how much time it took to not only search all those videos, but also taking the parts from each one to help accompany the vocals tune. And then editing the whole thing!

Take me to the stake, but I'm not a fan of the Bugatti Veyron. I just think the design is a bad pastiche of old and new.

I don't buy the "fake" argument here. Because who would go to such great lengths to fake this (and it must be a pain in the ass, 'cause there's no iPhone with that big a screen so you have to change the coding of iOS 8 to fit that particular display, not to mention the touch capability as well), but not only that, to…

How DARE you question gizmodo's logic with reasonable facts?!

I wonder if it's related to this

I just came here to say that facebook commenters are so edgy and avant garde that they just informed everyone of this being old news.

Wasn't there a recent improvement in non-crystalline metal that would make them perfect for screens in the future? As elastic as metal (not as much but WAY better than normal glass) and as transparent as glass: it's the future!

How...how did you get the shark on the freeway? Poor bastard needs water, at least close his eyes out of respect.

Nevertheless, the phrase "luck only favors the prepared mind" comes into place, so it is not less impressive :)

..how much the weight of 10,000 open browser tabs is dragging down your laptop's battery?

I was about to post this! I always remember that video because it's one of the scariest for me, no horror movie will ever get close to this for me anyway (except REC maybe). Also, i heard that they are paid jack shit to do that, something from $12 to $20 by the hour, which is really sad and unfair

Not to mention it didn't actually capture light speed since well, you kind of were seeing the "thing" move at what they claimed was speed of light. So the photons that were reaching your eyes WERE moving faster than that "thing" that was moving. But i'm pretty certain there's something i'm missing here.

I always thought those pockets were for condoms

Once you know how it works, you just wonder "how in hell people figured this out??". For those who don't know, it's a magnetic field making water molecules oscillate at very high frequencies because of its dielectric properties, thus heating the surrounding stuff. It's probably more complicated than that but i'll…

If you are using this mostly for reddit then i recommend getting the Reddit Enhancement Suite

What Michael said, that's the reason why i said that, because all you need to know is in the exif data on his flickr page, so it's a bit uncalled for writing the model of the camera in the first place. And also, i was kind of joking. (Although the point still stands).

"took his Canon 7D.." r/HailCorporate

I was about to ask what was this a reference to, thinking that there was no way a two click google search would give me an answer. How wrong was I.

They call it wireless bungee jumping i hear

I guess you could've said "painted" but then it wouldn't be clear that you used MS Paint so it's better to say "shopped" even if it isn't. Or maybe it is, Adobe engineers must be weeping over such amazing use of their software