Not really. Microsoft does not really have a stellar line up of exclusives for the X1 right now either. It seems that games exclusive to a single platform are drying up and instead the trendy thing is now timed dlc, extra content, etc.

Luffy's gum-gum power has really gotten out of hand...

I have put my volunteer work at my local LGBT safe space on every resume I have ever sent out. I refuse to remove it on principle. If that leads to me not getting the job, then I would not want to work for that company anyway.

You just contradicted yourself though. You say that, "if you secure them properly," then the risk is zero and yet you are suggesting that they should be as readily available and open as possible so that you can take out a home invader with speed. You cannot have both. Your gun is either out and accessable or it is not…

And how often do people kick the door in on your house in an attempt to harm you or your family? Is the extremely low odds of that happening worth the statistically much higher risk that a child might screw around and get severely injured?

So, they basically made a game based off of this cat .gif:

cool story bro. She get dental brah?

A Feast for Pugs

"hackers who chose to show their disdain for PunBuster"

I get the sense the sequel was already in the nascent stages when the first one released and it did poorly enough for the sequel to be cancelled.

"In the mystical land of bullshit"

He's not your friend, buddy!

I am practical enough to imagine that he did not consult a medical textbook and instead said "simple giant that can only say his name sounds good enough to me" and never put a name to it.

It is IF it is based on a real medical condition. In a world of dragons and frost zombies, would it be that much of a stretch that it is not aphasia and is instead something made up?

I have been able to get games for nearly half off within two weeks of release on all systems except Wii U (I don't play PC games). So, it is very doable

I did not like the first film at all, but enjoyed the second one quite a bit.

Ah, I was unaware that the substance use classification had been changed so heavily. My clinic is not planning to adopt it until late 2015 at the earliest, and so I admittedly have not done much digging in it.

Video game addiction is not currently in the DSM IV-TR and has not been added to the DSM V. So, claiming it is an "addiction" is already technically wrong, especially since addiction typically refers to a physical addiction characterized by potential for withdrawal.

Oh, is it Father's day again already? Welp, time to go back to bed