Yes, but should we take that money from research that could eliminate our giant Alzhiemer's problem and which only accounts for .01% of the debt, from the poor who are trying to claw their way out of poverty, or should we take it from military spending in foreign countries where we had no business being for 10+ years?

I am not a PS fanboy, but ps2 had some of the greatest games/franchises ever including:

Epic. I think she is going to have trouble finding that eharmony date though...

Wonka has implied something sarcastically, and so it must be true!

Good to see a proud misogynist out in the wild. Always helpful to have a reminder that the world still needs work.

Every sentence I saw in the article and the above post said Chinese. So, unless China is secretly a suburb of Japan, I think you just did not read it right.

Well, I suppose it can be sometimes. No worries.

Yes, but it was pretty apparent that Luke was being sarcastic and your response was treating his joke as a serious statement. You are absolutely entitled to respond, but his intent was very different than you originally thought.

But that is a pointed question too. If we are going for maximum non-pointedness, just ask "how much do you weigh?" You can figure out for yourself if that is a little tubby or not.

A little over a year ago, I would have laughed at even the idea of a Psychonauts 2. But, after the guy who made Minecraft half jokingly suggested he would back a Psychonauts 2 project and Tim Schafer and him then started getting friendly, I just don't know. I hope that Psychonauts 2 can get off the ground, and odds…

We study variables of behavior. WE ARE STUDYING THE BEHAVIOR OF X, NOT THE SYNAPSES THAT FIRED TO FORM X. I will be dismissing all future correspondence.

Oh, it is another one of your famous what if rants. We are not studying the human brain, we are studying VARIABLES. These do not necessarily pertain to the human brain. So, shut up.

When measuring the relation between two variables the intricacies of the human brain mean jackshit. Only things that would have a bearing on those two variables matter. And there are likely a dozen or more things that might need to be controlled. It is not infinite or near infinite and so the validity is unaffected.…

Yes, keep clinging to infinity despite the fact that you could never correctly apply that to anything. That is pure manipulation since there is not an infinite amount of variables at play. So, all you are doing is manipulating the result to support your flawed hypothesis.

"Stealing that animation, dempsey roll ftw." I see your vocabulary is improving.

The problem is you cannot disprove it mathematically. By your own admission, you can twist mathematics to do whatever the hell you want, but that does not mean you are using it properly. The obese women was my article moron.

But again, that has nothing to do with science, research, etc. That has to do with people being swayed by a person's charm/ability to manipulate. When looking at our two arguments, it is pretty clear that you are much closer to that than I am. I am saying that things need to be grounded in a factual basis, you are…

"People that critically think for themselves are the few people that stand up against these atrocities." Except that is the exact same type of person that creates said atrocities. When you are an "independent" thinker who does not care to validate your opinions with any sort of reality testing, you can act however you…

So, the cause of sexism is violent video games, gun control, and genocide? And we will also ignore our other detours into rape (which you were laughably ignorant on) and in regards to masculinity within media? So, they are all related in a deeper cause inception kind of way? Deep, man, deep. I smell troll.