Nice job trying to change the subject again. We were not talking about those studies, we were talking about the justification for genocide and slavery. Your ability to talk out of your ass is remarkable.

Actually, slavery and genocide were based off of idiots like you with your "independent" thinking and enforcing opinion as law. But, hey, facts never stopped you before! I would post links to support this, but you would not read them anyway.

Oh my, more of your what if lists that do not pertain to reality. What will I do?! The math only skews that way when you contend that there are an infinite number of variable. Funny how, even in your rampant what if lists from hell, you can only point out half a dozen. There are not an infinite number of variables in…

Who is manipulating statistics to prove their bias now? You tend to spiral out into what ifs, and it does not help your argument. As I have already said, our job is not to prove anything. No one would argue that a given variable is the definitive sole cause of a given relationship. But, after enough research has been…

As I said, you need to reread what I said because you are drifting even further from the point. The fact that you keep using the word "prove" shows that you have not been listening. Also, my argument was never "take my word for it," but you are so blinded by your desire to be right that it is evident you have missed…

At this point, you are making a cyclical argument and are just spinning your gears with more what ifs to support your point. I have no interest in repeating myself again. Every single concern you raised has already been explained in my myriad of posts, especially in my last one, so I suggest you reread them.

"I never said that, I simply said I THINK it's MORE trustworthy than yours." And I never said that you did. I said that that thought process, in which you think your friends are a preferable sample to a random, non biased one, is silly. You then accused me of creating false equivalencies and tautologies. I never…

"Tehemaii believes those studies are less trustworthy than the sample of the people he's met." And therein lies the problem. That is exactly why this conversation has been so problematic. I have been trying to engage with you at an intellectual level, and you have already made the assumption that nothing any…

"And I don't need to prove anything, you are the one that needs to prove. I said that today as it stands now, it is possible women are more objectified than men, it is possible men are more objectified than women, every opinion is valid and none are ridiculous if they as just that, an opinion. I'm just waving away…

Haha, I will reply again since you wisely changed the subject. I wrote a 40 page thesis on violence and video games, and your argument is not a defense. First, we will ignore the fact that guns and mental health screening/care would still bear primary responsibility even if there were a correlation between violence…

"I said I rather use my sample over their sample and that both samples are equally ridiculous." Yes, your sample of friends is equal to a statistically significant randomized sample.

"your articles refute mines the same way mines refute yours." Please learn how to properly use the word "mine." Also, you only gave one article about one issue we discussed; You never gave any other links to prove your point. In fact, you went as far as to say you informed yourself almost exclusively through…

Despite that hokey clip, it is a great show for the first 5 seasons. Best to stop there (and the season 5 finale was structured as a series finale anyway, so there is no pressing need to move forward). Season 6 and 7 kinda sucked, and this current season is not even the same show.

I feel like it jumped the shark this season more than anything. Season 6 was objectively bad, and season 7 was not much of an improvement, but it was at least still Supernatural. This season has felt like a different show completely.

I am done with this conversation. You made me angry with your tone and the ludicrousness of your argument, and I got dragged into the mud trying to argue with you. As far as I am concerned, I let myself lose my temper and act like you, and that is not right. So, you can feel any sense of superiority you want, but this…

So, let me get this straight; In your ignorant opinion, your random biases are equal to statistics and actual social research. Also, your "facts" (which are nothing more than your feelings) are unquestionable despite the fact that you have not shown a shred of evidence to support them while mine are impossible to…

Look, you are wrong and you know it. No amount of words are going to dig you out of this.

You are making the assumption that they feel that way based on societal restrictions and not on their own beliefs. Thus, it does not necessarily make them weak.

Vehemently disagree with you on point 3 since you are making assumptions on the devs intentions and that people finding it in poor taste are weak. Still, I suppose this is the closest we will get to agreeing on this one, so que sera sera I suppose :)

In regards to the concession, that is a partial quote. If you read the rest of that paragraph, you will see that I did not concede that his argument was correct, only that masculinity is a key part of media for kids. His point was much broader than that.