False equivalency?

“This may seem like an overly cynical and bad-faith interpretation of what Critical Role is doing with this new campaign.”

The best thing about the game is the way it respects your time, in total contrast to every other entry in the series.

I want to believe that maybe, THIS TIME AROUND, they’re actually prioritizing long-time PSN customers. They sure didn’t do that with Direct.

Congrats, you managed to write a 383 word summary of a 7 word update. Did you lose bet or something?

If that were the case, this video wouldn't have been made at all. It's strictly a liability disclaimer.

Oh, I’m sure Nintendo eventually will. I’m sure they’re brainstorming and working on one right now.

Well, it’s a nice way of saying, “Yes, it’s possible, but I don’t think it’s worth it.” You may think it’s confidence. I’m confident enough to say whatever I want, but civil enough to frame it in a way that doesn’t make it confrontational. It’s called working with people.

It’s amazing the lengths people will go to find something to be upset about. The guy worked on the game. This is a game that relies on the concept of fast loading. I’m going to go ahead and trust their word that this game wouldn’t work on a HDD because we have an entire library of games that we’ve seen run on HDDs and…

I’d highly recommend reading the article linked in this one. It’s a bit more thorough. This article is just a fucking hit piece that cherry picks the absolute worst takes on the whole situation.

If you want players to use different weapons why not give them advantages and disadvantages in different scenarios and against different enemies? Or make them so they’re only available at certain times? Using a crummy weapon durability mechanic doesn’t make gameplay more enjoyable. Why force players to hoard a variety…

It's a terrible system is why people don't like it

It’s a bit entitled to think that you, the One Customer, are the only arbiter of good and evil by “voting with your wallet”. Frankly, it’s a rather capitalist, primarily American perspective.

I... really don’t like how people think about companies and brands as authors. How people think of Blizzard and Activision as different entities but somehow Vicarious Visions is Blizzard because they’ve been making this one Diablo remake is very strange.

You are worried about a data point that is untestable for 3 years. Thats not a good faith argument.

Only if those temperatures are outside of normal tolerances for the component. 

I was. And damnit.

The video posted by ColorBlindMonk posits that the decreased surface area actually bears out an increase in airflow. Like the system was being choked by extraneous materials. I can’t speak to that since I’m not a thermodynamics expert, but it makes surface-level sense. The memory does seem to suffer. But I think…

You didn’t mention that Apple won every single other count besides this one. 

Welp, that’s good to know. If they didn’t want me to emulate that, they should’ve brought it out on PC or Switch or something.