I've heard the 200 be defended in many ways, but never with "it looks amazing."

Give Aaron a break, he's trying to pad his resume for a lateral promotion to Jezebel. Making mountains out of molehills is their milieu.

Get off my lake. and dont look at me when Im rescuing you. alright give 'em the hovercraf...DONT GIVE EM THE HOVERCRAFT!

Did someone get killed for skittles? I missed that. Who robbed someone for skittles?

For you we can order one with a double-tach that reads twice the actual motor RPM and we will swap the gearing around so you feel like you are enjoying a 9500rpm car.

Neutral: Which 2015 Colorado Would You Get? A 'Jalopnik Edition' doesn't exactly have the rear-end or other options you might like, would you skip the manual for a 4x4 or a bigger engine?

the lack of "fast" or "interesting to drive" is kind of the key difference.

This. So much this. Especially since we have a perfect example (Colorado) why car companies can't handle going back down this road.

Because this wasn't accepted as an appropriate response for a vehicle that should be brought back, it must belong here.

I don't care if the CVT stays...if it helps their MPG numbers fine, I just want the option of 3-pedals.

Can Ninja Turtle face be done-with already?

Its funny to me when people buy something that makes sound because of how they look.

*elicit

VW already makes high-quality vehicles at a good cost and employs skilled workers who are compensated accordingly. Why would they want to add in higher labor cost, crippling rules and regulations, and effectively lose control of their own company?

That's a trick question since the UAW has never helped anyone......... Ever.

The front is great, but it looks like a peice of plastic that got left in the oven too long, and then set across a rolling pin to cool. Droopy, especially at the rear.

Game over

It can imply it but there is no way, under any cirumstances, will I install or use iTunes. Sadly, I am the minority.