ChineapplePunk
ChineapplePunk
ChineapplePunk

I can't remember which personality it was (maybe Toby Turner or Nerdcubed), but some of their subscribers realised that clicking was how they made money and decided to repeatedly click on all their ads for their videos. The YouTuber had their account blocked as they thought they had set it up and he actually made a

Seriously?! Well fuck my life. Serves me right for not paying attention.

Can't unsee.

Brilliant. I got a gift card and I haven't seen anything on arcade I've wanted - swap it to cash so I can just buy an on demand game please! It always annoyed me that on demand games were bought with pounds instead of the points that were already on my account.

Exactly. People need to stop looking at the worst examples of tattoos from 20 odd years ago as an example of what modern day tattoos will look like decades from now.

That's because he's wearing the female version of the steampunk top...

I was having the same thought. Lived in various flats since I left home and I've never had the space for a dining table, those lucky bastards.

Well yeah it's click bait, but the fact is that like this article and your replies, it literally doesn't matter what is said in the article, because some people have their little agendas, completely ignore the thing anyway just to post stupid stuff in the comments. Chaces are there have been positive stuff in

The article made it here because it's about a video game, specifically one where a sequel will be dropping shortly.

I don't know about the official word, but probably to stop being seen as "just a gangsta GTA clone".

I think the fact that a female character would face different challenges and oppositions would make it a more interesting game, personally. Maybe it will happen in future GTAs. I hope so.

But that's not what the article is about. If commenters are just going to make up their minds without actually reading something and make it about a complaint about sex, then that's the commenter's problem. By that logic, Kotaku should never post articles mentioning/featuring anything to do with sex or women, as some

Did you read the article? Because to me, it comes off as a criticism of marketing techniques, not sex. I'm of the mind that it's just an easy way to get press (play the sex angle) so I can see why the company does it, but I agree with her that it's a bit of a shame because there is a bit more to it than just running

From a purely promotional angle, I can see why a company might just want to throw out some snippets about porn stars and dildo bats - you know the press will bite. It's not offensive enough to cause real damage like that level in a shooter where you go after an airport, or using the Jamie Bulger image, but it's enough

I think particularly back in the day tattoos could be pretty dodgy, and so most of the older generations with tats seem to look a bit janky now (most of the criticism I see is the "what about when you get older?" variety). But as long as you aren't being silly and getting something on a whim, and you're going to a

It's good that you worry - means that if/when you do get one, you won't rush it and regret it.

It's all context to me. Taxidermy (I'm assuming this is along those lines) is fine, some kid strangling cats and keeping them in his tree house should probably be watched.

Well, I don't earn that much and there's rent and bills and a savings account and holidays and social events (I can't stick gaming in there as none of my friends are gamers) and birthdays and Christmas is coming up... you know how it is. :) But I reckon PS4 + Christmas/January sales should get me a good bundle.

I want a PS3 so much. Hopefully they will go down in price after PS4 drops so I can justify getting one.