*tears flow from one, red eye*

... wait a minute...

It's nothing compared to a piece of fresh fruit or a poin-ted stick...

Actually, you both are right. Starbucks sources a stronger roast of bean (less caffeine, oh no!) while brewing it with half the water and substituting the rest with ice.

I stand corrected, I thank you for the merciful bump.

If you're going to hate something, know it's name!

'Reverse tracking shot' is the phrase with which I am more familiar.

I definitely get your point, but it *is* (as you pointed) slightly invalid, as it does not contain the original part necessary to the argument: that any endeavor deemed creative either by the originator or an onlooker (read: creativity) requires some measure of intelligence.

This is my best shot.

There is a difference between the two, but that does not mean creativity does not or can not require intelligence.

If Mr. Francis had only read further and realized that the "child learning center operated by the Wilshire Boulevard Temple in Los Angeles" was really just a center for ants, and sometimes kids that don't read good.

What a hoopy frood!

I thought jellyfish had an affinity for warm waters.

Get this man one Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster.

He could dance if he wanted to...

Is there?!

*deeper breath and longer sigh*.

You cannot run out of dimensions, just as you cannot run out of numbers. It barely makes sense because you're testing the furthest reaches of your sense of perception in four-dimensional space: intuition.

What is this... I don't even...

That ugly shape is Red's hood... something I'll never say again.