CaptainTurbo
CaptainTurbo
CaptainTurbo

The times I do find this point of view to be accurate is when a player is playing for the reward. I will find myself playing 2-3 more matches for the loot box when I’m not entirely interested in playing those matches... that’s no good. I don’t feel in any way that there is an “unfairness” to this, but I get the idea

My ONLY issue with loot boxes are the duplicates. The currency you receive for getting a duplicate is so tiny, so useless. When you’re saving up $1000 and a rare skin duplicate gives you $15... just why?

He attacks his own credibility by doing such a heinous job writing a proper game review. Reviews as negative as his is for Uncharted 4 are generally backed up by informed points that resonate with people who experienced the game; his review is packed full of childish opinion having little to do with the product. He

Nathan’s grey towel has a higher thread count than my actual shower towel at home. = (

You’re still not getting it.

I think you guys read a little bit too much into what was exactly written and didn’t consider what he actually meant. It’s simply commentary on the length of time it takes for a developed to fix a simple issue, and the ease a fan has in creating a patch themselves that works perfectly well.

I could certainly see myself following a few of these things. The minimap isn’t necessary, although I do think playing nearly the entire game in hunter vision is every bit as bad as having the map in the corner (or worse), which would pretty much be a prerequisite with the steep costs of crafting high level gear and

I’ve seen the attempts at it, especially with Grace, but I don’t see why YouTube NEEDS to do that at all. It seems like a silly way to spend money when they make enormous profits from the website and it’s popular stars are doing very well for themselves.

You’re right though, many entities are attempting to use his

I would have loved to see the painting changed to the Ubisoft logo.

He really wasn’t; according to dozens of his video’s he’s never aspired to do anything other than make videos on YouTube for his fans.

There isn’t even a hint of a negative tone in this article.

How did I not know a sequel was on it’s way...?

If any person objects to this post, they are extremely out of touch and/or extremely biased.

I think we’ve come as close as we can do a conclusion, the rest will be answered with time.
I’m not worried about the open world being effected. While there was a world map to explore, there isn’t a real feeling of choice in what you do or where you go. With the exception of Wutai, I suppose. We’ll see where it goes.

For the sake of argument, I can’t imagine playing only the Witcher 3 main story taking 43 hours. It’s hard for me to be sure because of how much I did between missions, but rushing through the story feels like it would take more like 20 hours; I’ll admit I could definitely be mistaken here.
I don’t expect this to go

My opinion isn’t based on the amount of CD’s used for the original game. I honestly believe you’ve forgotten about the amount of content in the original game, and that of other RPG’s developed in that time period. There aren’t other AAA games that have the same or more, not without cutting major corners and being

Witcher 3 is the only case of a game that is bigger than it possibly should be. And I don’t have a good answer other than, it’s not quite as polished graphically... I guess.

You wouldn’t be paying $70. You’d essentially be paying for at least 3 full length games were this to be translated over to current media. Your argument only makes sense if you’re OK paying $150 minimum for a game that will come out years from now.

I’d rather that not be the case, personally.

You didn’t even read the article. This isn’t honest, it’s just wrong.
I don’t know why you think a 100 hour RPG rendered the way we see in the trailer can fit on a disc. It’s like you don’t even care about actual tangible reality while you make this statement.

This is absolutely brilliant. Omg.