CSW
Wittus
CSW

I’ve run out of weiner jokes.”

Where was IT in all of this? If the chain is using a centralized ordering system, surely it is possible to 1) cancel all orders involving this voucher and 2) disable the voucher? I’m from Denmark, so apologies for the (perhaps) naive question, as Denmark is comparable in size to one of your states (on a good day), but

The Talos Principle 2. And nothing else.

I haven’t seen the video article, as I absolutely hate that form of journalism, but the short answer is “Yes”.

Dane here. It really isn’t that much of a deal to NOT be in a union in Scandinavia, as the workers (myself included) have a lot of rights through their standard contract. The right to five weeks of holiday (most places extended to six weeks), the right to see a doctor in business hours (but do try to place them

Good for him, but as a freelance video game reviewer with a senior IT dayjob, I think I made the right choice. Being happy at 52 with a mortgage, a few cars, a wife and two (almost grown) kids would not have been feasible on a reviewer’s salary :)

Would have been more impressive, if it had ACTUALLY looked like Nicolas Cage in the screenshot above.

Did they run out of news to post, since they started giving housekeeping advice all of a sudden? Weird.

No “Weather with you” or “The boys of summer”? I’m outta here!

I played this on Game Pass and then invested in the physical game for my collection, since I love pretty much everything Remedy has released. I only got the play it several years after its release, since I didnøt have an X1 at the time, but I was not disappointed. Definitely a special experience, which - granted - is

That is definitely my take. Yes, there is a chance that someone just NEEDS to own that skin, but I don’t believe that. Money laundering is a much more probable answer.

Scalpers are, simply put, rotten people.

Beware that a few of them are existing/coming “free” PSPlus titles, if you’re a subscriber.

Thank you for the suggestion, which is duly noted.

If we could keep the discussion sober, I’d really appreciate it. I only clicked the article to give my opinion about spoilers, as I really enjoy reading Kotaku and generally think, the writers here are responsible when relaying sensible information/spoilers.

Apparently :) Sorry :)

No, that would not constitute a spoiler for me, seeing as the game is 10 years old. It is dishing out specifics for certain scenes/episodes, that irks me the wrong way. Again, YMMV and I am not late to mention that I acknowledge this, but still we should be able to discuss it, right? Anyhoo, people are calling me

Are you serious right now, Superman? Anyway, I avoid social media, and Kotaku is NOT social media in my definition; this is an article by a respected media outlet.

As I said, I might be a bit touchy here, but it all feeds back to a culture, where you need to be first with everything - whether you’re a reviewer wanting to stand out or a marketing team trying to bait you.

You might be right, but I try to skip those as well. It’s a bad habit (in my opinion) to show what’s coming. If current episode/series is good “enough”, we WILL see the next episode. No need to lure me in, I say :)