My list was heavily biased toward what engine set up is most resistant to heat.

I’m not sure what this means, my friend?

My list is highly biased toward which setup is the most resistant to heat and therefore allows you to push your car the longest on track.

Having only driven one hybrid on track, I don’t have enough references to agree with nor reject your list.

McLaren uses it because of fuel economy and it aligns with what their F1 cars are using.

F1 uses turbos because they were forced to reduce their cylinder count and turbos are the more effective way of getting big power out of a smaller engine than supercharging.

I’ll agree with that.

Are you being serious? In terms of what motors are best on track, it goes:

Wow. So, it really isn’t that long. I guess the fact that it’s so low exaggerates the perception of its length.

It is indeed. However, why are you bringing this up?

Well said.

Interesting question. I think in regards to Rufs and Porsches, people either love or hate them.

Really?

The major issue with the S7 was that it was a terrible thing to drive. The clutch was heavy, the engine hated low rpms, the cabin was cramped, the pedal box was minuscule, and don’t even get me started on the horrific panel gaps. That being said, it was a gorgeous vehicle and was very innovative in terms of…

It’s 188 in. So, it’s nearly identical to a Lamborghini Aventador.

Gillet Vertigo

Ok.

The only reason I knew whose it was is due to the fact that he’s the only one I know of that has a Tungsten GT with an aero kit. In addition, I still remember him rolling up to VIR with it and telling us the story of how he had it tested at a facility that does work for a lot of Nascar teams.

Thanks.

Oh really? Others have said it’s a “Ford GT.”