Whether she wanted them or not at the time she wasn’t in a position to negotiate for them. Not with the way the market was back then. She wasn’t a major player back then and video game voice acting jobs were still fairly limited. This is still when it was an exception for a game to have a full voice cast rather than…

Just because it looks different to the original model doesn't mean it looks bad dude. Calm the fuck down.

I think it’s worse the more stylised the original was. So Cole looks better because photorealism was kinda what they were going for in LA Noire (and they did face capture to try and mimic human expressions too) where as Cloud looks.... wrong.

This isn't going to change until governments crack down on the act of scalping. Until that happens, and the more brazen scalpers act the more governments have been taking notice, these assholes are going to ruin things for everyone else.

Also people being convinced that you could create scarcity of digital assets without a centralised platform controlling the assets. Which relied on convincing people that tokens are assets.

Money wasted as I doubt that show will get made now. What's the point in creating a marketing vehicle for worthless junk? I mean I know they were worthless before but now even the suckers aren't buying them.

No that’s still a terrible example. The blockchain is not a distribution network. It’s prohibitively expensive to host any significant amount of data on the blockchain. The music still has to be hosted somewhere. And there’s no real advantage to the musician than there is existing methods of selling direct to…

And how does this translate into an actual real world use case? What's an actual example of a transaction that could be improved with the use of NFTs?

The unemployment line?

NFTs were always a doomed venture and the clue was in the name the entire time. They are tokens, not assets. They are proof you own a thing, not the thing itself. So all the buzzwords that crypto simps liked to throw around to tout their alleged benefits were never going to work. Things like “trustless” and…

Not to mention the people making these decisions are typically so far removed from the actual running of the company and often reality itself.

No, it’s a 1/3rd of a story remade into a new game. It’s not literally just a third of the original 1997 game. Your argument only makes sense if they did a straight remake of the first part of FF7. But that’s not the case, there’s a lot of content in Remake that isn’t in the original FF7. And not just bits and pieces…

Quest for Glory!

It’s something that you used to see more often. It certainly wasn't common but it wasn't unheard of. There's an old series of Sierra RPG adventure games called Quest for Glory where you could bring the same character from the first game all the way to the fifth game.

Another Direct, another lack of announcement of a Skies of Arcadia remake/port.

Reminds me of the disastrous Xbox One launch when Sony just dunked on Microsoft by having a dude hand another dude a disc to demonstrate how game sharing worked on PlayStation.

VCs and PEs, is there anything they can't ruin?

Unity has very much forgotten that they built their success off being a cheaper more accessible alternative to big engines like Unreal. After pushing their competition to up their game in this regard it seems insane that they'd undermine themselves in this fashion.

I don’t really begrudge it either because it sounds like the guy who made it is pretty young if he’s still in education. I certainly wasn't overly concerned about copyright when I was making my school game projects. Also would explain the NFT bullshit. Zoomers seem especially susceptible to crypto scams.

I just want a primarily single player or co-op experience. Other players are kind of what spoiled Sea of Thieves for me personally. Sure it was kind of cool to mess with other people or join up with others on a whim. But because everyone was playing in the same sandbox with PVP elements they were really limited in…