One of three things should have happened.

Ok, so I have a question. I remember hearing that “simulating a snap count” by the defens is illegal. Is there a *specific* rule for that, or does “simulating a snap count” fall under...

It’s actually market price for a Gallardo, but you have to factor in the cost of getting rid of all that shit that’s in and on it.

10 out of 10 would hoon!

OMG, I JUST NOTICED THIS!

They are also going to write a new WWII book, with gems like:

I would love to see what would happen if a squirrel or rabbit runs out onto the field during one of these games.

As long as there can be infinite amounts of money in politics a meaningful discussion about this will never happen.

This needs to be on a TV show.

Defnitely not a clown shoe.

The real test will be what happens when Peyton Manning or Tom Brady takes a hit for handing the ball of out of a shotgun.

After seeing what soccer hooligans do in general and what players do to refs, I’m gonna guess that “insurance liability” is the last thing on the leagues mind.

I believe your statement qualifies.

“I can only get a shitty car, but look at the weapons I can afford, yo!”

Here’s where I have a problem with this. In most circumstances, you can’t hit a quarterback below the waist. There’s a rule against that. Now, the defender has to decide what type of play he’s allowed to do so. It needs to be more consistent. You can either hit a QB low or you can’t.

“All your rams are belong to us!”

Ugh...between this crap and the various “Housewives/Divas/Whocares of Whogivesaratsass” my wife totally bogarts the TV. I just read and stream other stuff from my laptop to minimize brain cell loss.

#AllahuAkbar

I’m really having a hard time believing that wasn’t done on purpose.

Giggity!