I can hardly blame a model for doing as instructed by the art director or photographer, right? It's not her dubious choice. I choose to remember Ewoks as man-eating mini-bears.

I 'm just saying, the pose isn't dubious if the hands are meant to resemble the Ewok ears. I'll give you the dress itself.

But, her hands are like the Ewok ears...

Not that I've been able to find. Original site no longer carries the design.

I tried going to the original site they were sold on, but alas it looks like it is no more.

If you got a time machine, one is available. (See my other post.)

I still rock my io9 shirt from ~4 years ago! (Big hit at Cons.) I dig the update to the Space Porn shirt. Time to add to the collection!

Excellent! Firestone Walker is hard to come by out here on Long Island. I can at least hit up a Trader Joe's now.

Mission St is brewed by Firestone Walker?

I think it's the lack of pupils in that screencap... creeptastic!

I'm kind of weirded out too. Is it the same/better/worse in motion?

I've gotten as far as putting it in to my Netflix instant queue. Soon, maybe soon I will get to watching it.

Well played, señor Spielbergo.

Seems they are classifying on "principal university affiliations" at time of awarding of the Prize. I wonder how they classify "principal affiliation." Is it where the findings where published? Where they are doing the research/work?

So... Not gingerbread? Damnit.

True, it does routinely enter atmospheres. I don't think it uses it's aerodynamics to fly through the atmosphere though, since overall it can't be very aerodynamic- the drag coefficient must be hell for the ship given all "guts" on the oustide. I think the large dish on the dorsal-port side and the starboard side…

She's the fastest hunk of junk in the galaxy!

I used to do the same, but with Star Wars figures. I had a closet full of the stuff, floor to ceiling. Some of the figures I'd buy 2, one for display, the other for squirreling away. After about 2 years, I couldn't keep up with the sheer volume of the figures.

Ad hominem attacks are grounds for banning. Please refrain from doing so in the future.

I think CJA is saying boo right here- ...this doesn't play like "versatile actors cross race and gender lines, to inhabit different physicalities." Rather, it plays like pantomime...