Or it points to his doing something beautiful often and in a myriad of contexts and that might have been the motivation to have the camera running here. It may be true they'd had vegetarian-related convos before, but I doubt a mother with pre-established compunctions against serving/eating meat would prepare some…

That review further confirm that anything with Lindelof's name attached to it should be avoided outright.

And Houston was playing better-than-regular-season defense on him, esp. on the perimeter. The way they were glued to him sometimes would have been instantly whistled in the regular season (or any time against LeBron or the Wade of seasons past). I think the struggles were mainly team- and coaching-oriented. Here you…

I dunno. 35.5 pts (.534%), 9.25 rbds, and 5.75 asts (his average in the four Houston games without Westbrook) doesn't quite look like "struggling" to me.

That is some bullshit. Like they can't keep it under observation for a fairly brief time (because doesn't it manifest quickly?) to make sure it's not rabid. And is rabies spread merely by contact? I bet that fireman will be so relieved to find out he doesn't need shots.

This.

That's frustrating. Google the poem. There are some mid-line gaps making better sense of the syntax that didn't take in the posting.

The Sheep Child
BY JAMES L. DICKEY

Farm boys wild to couple
With anything with soft-wooded trees
With mounds of earth mounds
Of pine straw will keep themselves off
Animals by legends of their own:
In the hay-tunnel dark
And dung of barns, they will
Say I have heard tell

That in a museum…

Seconded.

No vocal mimicry you say?

He's great in The Believer, Half Nelson, and Blue Valentine, and works a minor miracle in Lars and the Real Girl, which didn't work, but without him would have been as bad as I can only believe it must have been on paper.

I dunno. Girl telling boy not to be such a girl sounds like irony maybe?

And?

You're making an ass of yourself and being nasty while doing it. Punishment happens during sentencing, which happens after the trial, and only if in the course of that trial guilt has been proven. There is no presumption of innocence in the sentencing stage because, with innocence having been disproved in the trial…

No, "innocent until proven guilty" pretty clearly refers to trials, you know, where the proving of guilt happens or not. Why would a court punish and sentence someone presumed to be innocent? Do you think about anything ever? I see you've already been hipped to an important distinction already, but will note further…

There's a presumption of innocence. Being found not guilty means your status remains unchanged: innocent.

Don't knock it. Could be right up your alley.

You know that "looking for" and "noticing" aren't necessarily the same thing, right? Of course you do.

Gortat's response was great:

I appreciated their linking to this: