What do her kids have to do with that? And frankly, even if she is reprehensible with reprehensible opinions (which I don't know, since I haven't read her stuff), threatening to KILL her for hypothetically thinking this racist guy was justified still isn't ok. SHE didn't kill anyone. SHE didn't do anything except…

Um, if that were the case, would it be somehow wrong for her not to want her children to be threatened? Is this a weird little quirk of hers, not wanting her kids to deal with death threats? Jesus. I haven't been following, so I don't know what she's been saying, but nothing she could say or suggest would make it ok…

Where is that from?

Which is why she said "I think the pill is great for those who don't have many sustained side-affects."

I have one month and 27 days before I expire. Dammit! I guess it's time to hit OK Cupid.

Team cat people are kind of proud of that. And I mean, lions are CUTE. They're just also terrifying. Why limit ourselves to one or the other?

The anxiety, sure. The entitlement that led him to believe he has a right to sue over the fact that he was held to the same grading standard as everyone else, no. If a woman in an engineering class decided to skip the whole semester, then fail, then sue over the fact that she was uncomfortable in a room full of guys,…

Er, what is confusing about this? She is saying she still eats "treats" i.e. she's not fanatic about calorie counting, despite being thin. While it's possible that someone can eat a banana split once a week and then starve the rest of the week, in the context of her comment that isn't what she is saying. Unless…

Ugh, he sounds like the worse. I'm sorry you had to deal with that. We may disagree on the password thing, but he was clearly a huge jerk and I'm glad you found him out.

I have never cheated and can't imagine ever cheating. But I would never tolerate this. I dated a guy for 6 years and never gave him my fb/email passwords and never would, despite trusting him implicitly. Nor, despite an incident early on in our relationship, did I ever monitor him or demand passwords from him. …

Saying that the only reason she has him on her record is for "street cred" and not because, I don't know, she respects and enjoys his music comes across that way. She's a musician. She, as a professional musician, probably socializes with a lot of other musicians from a lot of other genres and appreciates diverse…

You sound really racist right now. I'm assuming that's not your intention, but it's coming across that way.

Huh. I never considered Hooters waitresses to be in that category honestly. I applied to work there once but would never strip/do porn/etc. No judgement, but I couldn't do it. As for applying to work at Hooters (as a waitress) my family has been going my whole life so putting in an application was like applying…

Lol, I noticed that too! I have never used a washcloth and don't feel like this impacts my hygiene. But to each their own.

Careful not to over wash his skin either, since that can cause the skin to freak out and actually produce more oil. A nice natural way to deal with acne (in addition to creams/medicine from an actual doctor) is washing your face with castor oil instead of soap. Rub castor oil on, put a hot damp towel on your face to…

He was talking ABOUT HER behind her back, presumably negatively, to try to get "clever points." That has nothing to do with her being upset about his being gay; it's about being upset that her friend feels free to disrespect her.

She looks so good in that first black dress! And everything fits her! See, this is PROOF that if she just got stuff tailored right she could look great in dresses.

When you send a complete stranger a message like this, you are opening yourself up to a certain amount of mockery. To put it another way, he clearly doesn't care if he's violating her boundaries by immediately going somewhere inappropriate and sexual in his message, so he can't really expect her to somehow maintain…

Wow me too. 90% of my messages are from Indian guys, which is fine obviously, but was a little confusing statistically.

I do wonder, considering that they aren't hooking up the fallopian tubes and therefore have to go the IVF route anyway, why this is any better than using a surrogate? I mean, I'm looking forward to one day being pregnant and will be very disappointed if I can't, but this surgery isn't enabling women to naturally have…