BrooklynNomad1
BrooklynNomad1
BrooklynNomad1

"The thing is that women will wear a seatbelt that don't work or they're wear a purse that doesn't work or, quite frankly, some women's bodies don't work for it."

My parents took us all the time as kids, so I actually have very warm feelings toward the restaurant. In fact, I have taken my younger siblings, who range in age from 3 - 27, to Hooters myself before because it's a fun, affordable restaurant with tasty food. And I'm female. But we're from Florida, where short shorts

Ha. Well, fair enough then.

Um, do you equate your children with mass murdering terrorists? Because that might be a whole other problem.

I know. I clicked hoping there was something more to it, but it's just a tirade about how much this one actress sucks. Not because she's actually done anything sucky...just b/c the author thinks she's not interesting or relevant enough? I'm put off at the pointless venom.

The sad thing is that even if he gets the belt now it will probably remind of how he was treated this day. So this belt, which he was excited about and saved up for, is now ruined for him. Barneys deserves to get sued so hard, and I hope he wins a lot of money from them.

It takes a long time to grow back. Also, and this may just be in my mind, but I was sad when I cut my hair because even though I look better with it shorter, to me long hair looked fun and young, whereas I was afraid I would look more conservative/frumpy with it shorter. It's still kind of silly to get all attached,

OMG Italy. I love you. Stop being so stupid. It's embarassing.

I can see your point of view too, by the way, but it's really note the tone I got from this article. So I don't know. Maybe you're right, but if someone wrote an article like this about ME (which, ha, not famous so not a problem) I would be really uncomfortable around them in the future.

Eh. He made a big deal of not wanting to come across as yet another person who wanted something from JT but he's dissected their one minor meeting publicly in this article, presumably to drum up some sales for his non-related book, and admitted to creeping around trying to spy on what JT was doing in his room with the

Yeah, thought that was creepy too. His whole essay made me a little uncomfortable. From the jealousy to the actual meeting to then writing this article, the author seems WAY too invested in this guy that he only met once for dinner. Like he's trying to be seem too cool to be just a "fan," but it really isn't working.

OMG. I can't with this. And he's both a "CEO" and a wedding photographer? Interesting. Not many of those around. Not suspicious at all.

Yeah, except at least we now have free birth control and people with pre-existing conditions can't be turned down. So it's still worth having. I just wish we were single payer like every other first world country.

If I remember correctly, when Obamacare was still a glint in Obama's eye, he did originally attempt to make it into a one payer system unconnected to jobs, but that was so roundly shouted down we have the watered down, only slightly better than nothing version we ended up with. Though, don't get me wrong, slightly

I just don't agree. It's like sending a person an email or a letter. If you hand someone a letter on their way on the door, or give them a package as they're getting into their car, is it your fault they're dumb enough to read/open it while driving? This is something that is solely and completely in the driver's

Someone sending a text is NOT "causing a very dangerous distraction." They are causing a little ping to sound on someone's phone. It's not like the phone automatically floats up to the driver's face and hangs there. People can easily choose to wait until they're not driving to check their messages. Just like they can

The thing is, as easy as it is to make fun of Courtney Stodden (and I'm tempted too at times) she's a kid. She's a kid who looks older and dresses older and "acts" older than she is, but she's a kid who is married to a much older, gross man that her parents basically gave her to. And when I actually think about it, it

As others have said, most of us are not British citizens and do not necessarily get behind titles that are born or married into rather than earned. I personally don't see how it's either "appropriate" or "inappropriate" to refer to Kate Middleton by her name. I am fully neutral on the title, and certainly don't care

Is that Star photo with Kate in a pink dress photoshopped? B/c I didn't think there were any pictures of her and the baby outside of the one appearance leaving the hospital. Did they just straight up create a photo?

Agree. I hate confrontation so I tend to bottle it up and get a little passive agressive-y sometimes, but to make a point of leaving little mean comments on someone's facebook posts all the time is definitely lame, and makes the writer look like an asshole.